TOP 200 effective Steemit curators for the 2017.10.19

I want to share with you statistics about the most effective Steemit curators.

This statistic is not about how much the authors or curators have earned. This statistics shows the list of curators, whose contribution to the reward pool distribution is the most significant.

image source

---

What does this mean?

You can say that there is nothing interesting in this statistics. That it is clear that the reward pool is distributed by whales. But!

The most interesting thing is how the curator distributes the reward pool. He can vote only for his posts and his comments. He can vote for a selected circle of authors and affiliated accounts. But also he can vote for a large number of authors who publish interesting content.

Thus, an effective curator is a curator who has sufficient Steem Power (he can be an investor or a popular author who has earned his Steem Power by publishing interesting content), devoting time and effort to the content curating at Steemit and distributing a reward pool in favor of the authors. And the efficiency level is estimated by how much SBD curator distributes among as many authors as possible.

---

How it works?

Votes - Each curator distributes a certain part of the reward pool with his votes (upvote / flag).

Authors - This part of the pool he distributes between a certain number of authors.

VAS (vote average strength) - For general awareness, we can estimate the average vote strength in percents (%), with which the curator votes.

Contr. (SBD) (Contribution in SBD) - The distributed part of the pool is the contribution of the curator, it is calculated in SBD. In this case, the author's reward is taken into account. The curator's reward is not taken into account.

Share % - The percentage of the of the curator contribution among the contributions of all curators, we can also estimate for information purposes in %.

Eff. - The effectiveness of the curator is estimated in conventional units and is calculated as follows.

The total number of authors who published their posts for the period under study is determined.
Then the contribution of the curator is divided by the total number of authors, and then multiplied by the number of authors for whom the curator voted for the period.

Thus, we see that, having distributed even a smaller number of SBD between a larger number of authors, the curator can be more effective than other curators. At the same time, having a greater voice power, but not actively voting, supporting a small number of authors, the curator takes a lower position in the rating.

And now, statistics.

---

6937 authors published their posts during this day.

15719 accounts participated in the content curating according to information from the database.

171448 votes were made during this day.

35494,09 SBD - is the total author rewards for this day.

---

TOP-200 effective curators for October 19, 2017 (24 hours period)

№	Account	Votes	Authors	VAS(%)	Contr. (SBD)	Share %	Eff.
1	@curie	159	158	5	1824,12	5,14	41,55
2	@hendrikdegrote	159	158	5	1134,77	3,2	25,85
3	@pharesim	637	584	0	242,69	0,68	20,43
4	@good-karma	652	551	1	159,47	0,45	12,67
5	@blocktrades	26	23	38	2253,04	6,35	7,47
6	@htliao	108	97	11	459,02	1,29	6,42
7	@sweetsssj	97	70	9	604,29	1,7	6,1
8	@trafalgar	96	87	10	447,9	1,26	5,62
9	@timsaid	127	116	12	286,23	0,81	4,79
10	@linuslee0216	75	66	14	498,55	1,4	4,74
11	@wackou	90	83	16	358,06	1,01	4,28
12	@teamsteem	104	71	11	411,15	1,16	4,21
13	@xeldal	178	146	6	183,14	0,52	3,85
14	@surpassinggoogle	108	84	7	312,13	0,88	3,78
15	@ausbitbank	134	106	7	241,87	0,68	3,7
16	@tumutanzi	73	70	12	355,27	1	3,58
17	@gavvet	62	51	19	438,22	1,23	3,22
18	@nicolemoker	51	49	16	406,03	1,14	2,87
19	@bue	436	398	100	42,06	0,12	2,41
20	@nanzo-scoop	137	76	12	196,27	0,55	2,15
21	@bellyrub	69	63	6	203,77	0,57	1,85
22	@kpine	28	18	36	656,36	1,85	1,7
23	@acidyo	30	26	29	444,31	1,25	1,67
24	@donkeypong	45	39	20	275,41	0,78	1,55
25	@clayop	82	76	11	139,98	0,39	1,53
26	@cryptoctopus	53	49	28	212,14	0,6	1,5
27	@canadian-coconut	41	35	19	291,38	0,82	1,47
28	@busy.org	121	101	11	96,13	0,27	1,4
29	@anwenbaumeister	159	158	5	58,13	0,16	1,32
30	@kushed	170	168	6	53,76	0,15	1,3
31	@ats-david	33	30	28	287,38	0,81	1,24
32	@alexis555	61	53	18	152,91	0,43	1,17
33	@redes	64	59	18	129	0,36	1,1
34	@abit	19	18	35	405,43	1,14	1,05
35	@livingfree	54	29	21	249,84	0,7	1,04
36	@ripperone	61	57	18	119,47	0,34	0,98
37	@newhope	58	48	18	135,56	0,38	0,94
38	@reggaemuffin	27	22	71	297,16	0,84	0,94
39	@analisa	45	39	20	154,43	0,44	0,87
40	@bitcoiner	675	565	2	10,23	0,03	0,83
41	@adsactly	21	15	40	380,18	1,07	0,82
42	@barrie	291	288	2	18,83	0,05	0,78
43	@lafona-miner	62	62	12	85,21	0,24	0,76
44	@sndbox	18	15	47	345,95	0,97	0,75
45	@emilhoch	116	65	9	77,94	0,22	0,73
46	@cervantes	49	49	17	96,79	0,27	0,68
47	@kevinwong	52	46	17	93,99	0,26	0,62
48	@damarth	38	31	24	139,22	0,39	0,62
49	@oldtimer	41	37	33	113,98	0,32	0,61
50	@dragonslayer109	97	79	14	52,65	0,15	0,6
51	@juliank	87	40	11	103,66	0,29	0,6
52	@mangos	57	53	18	79	0,22	0,6
53	@rok-sivante	40	34	96	120,4	0,34	0,59
54	@ramengirl	19	19	23	208,53	0,59	0,57
55	@thejohalfiles	9	7	78	530,59	1,49	0,54
56	@hanshotfirst	63	56	15	66,25	0,19	0,53
57	@enki	90	82	8	42,2	0,12	0,5
58	@officialfuzzy	29	22	40	157,8	0,44	0,5
59	@arama	20	15	81	208,79	0,59	0,45
60	@esteemapp	608	519	1	6,08	0,02	0,45
61	@midnas-howler	50	48	19	63,07	0,18	0,44
62	@vcelier	29	25	32	115,99	0,33	0,42
63	@fuzzyvest	12	11	74	257,57	0,73	0,41
64	@utopian-io	12	11	61	243,87	0,69	0,39
65	@hr1	28	28	20	92,63	0,26	0,37
66	@arcange	222	181	9	13,58	0,04	0,35
67	@stackin	90	71	11	34,19	0,1	0,35
68	@ace108	72	53	15	45,15	0,13	0,34
69	@ramta	26	21	25	112,71	0,32	0,34
70	@v4vapid	13	11	44	205,72	0,58	0,33
71	@zeartul	31	24	24	96,4	0,27	0,33
72	@feruz	629	530	1	4,38	0,01	0,33
73	@msp-lovebot	208	133	10	17,14	0,05	0,33
74	@vortac	31	20	38	108,91	0,31	0,31
75	@shaka	46	45	10	45,01	0,13	0,29
76	@boomerang	36	28	16	70,52	0,2	0,28
77	@jackkang	23	23	50	83,29	0,23	0,28
78	@originalworks	466	398	1	4,66	0,01	0,27
79	@steemprentice	438	394	3	4,45	0,01	0,25
80	@glitterfart	9	4	100	425,86	1,2	0,25
81	@rexusmo	101	63	10	27,8	0,08	0,25
82	@liberosist	14	14	58	121,62	0,34	0,25
83	@steemed-proxy	6	6	100	277,44	0,78	0,24
84	@lastminuteman	376	356	1	4,76	0,01	0,24
85	@gringalicious	60	52	14	30,59	0,09	0,23
86	@bramd	11	9	100	176,11	0,5	0,23
87	@famunger	15	14	100	114,39	0,32	0,23
88	@cheerup	138	112	3	13,8	0,04	0,22
89	@cryptohustlin	478	354	4	4,27	0,01	0,22
90	@slowwalker	15	14	28	110,11	0,31	0,22
91	@bobbylee	58	26	100	57,07	0,16	0,21
92	@oldstone	20	16	38	84,88	0,24	0,2
93	@kus-knee	62	34	16	40,35	0,11	0,2
94	@pgarcgo	47	47	17	27,5	0,08	0,19
95	@jerrybanfield	41	24	23	55,5	0,16	0,19
96	@cryptopassion	23	11	44	116,67	0,33	0,19
97	@gomeravibz	376	354	2	3,72	0,01	0,19
98	@kommienezuspadt	14	13	73	94,11	0,27	0,18
99	@ezzy	39	28	29	42,79	0,12	0,17
100	@webdeals	74	53	10	22,44	0,06	0,17
101	@surfyogi	33	15	28	76,78	0,22	0,17
102	@theprophet0	9	6	75	200,87	0,57	0,17
103	@justtryme90	23	23	55	50,55	0,14	0,17
104	@jonny-clearwater	29	24	100	46,08	0,13	0,16
105	@morning	24	20	63	56,55	0,16	0,16
106	@heiditravels	42	42	17	25,66	0,07	0,16
107	@gargon	47	47	18	23,79	0,07	0,16
108	@thecryptofiend	63	37	16	29,1	0,08	0,16
109	@mammasitta	117	84	11	13,41	0,04	0,16
110	@leomichael	46	39	21	25,94	0,07	0,15
111	@anu	77	71	8	15,01	0,04	0,15
112	@lukestokes	15	13	78	77,76	0,22	0,15
113	@kaylinart	25	17	50	57,63	0,16	0,14
114	@abdullar	8	8	78	123,01	0,35	0,14
115	@chitty	35	23	50	42,11	0,12	0,14
116	@promoted	38	33	11	29,56	0,08	0,14
117	@thinknzombie	225	167	4	5,49	0,02	0,13
118	@aomura	78	65	100	13,9	0,04	0,13
119	@corn113	27	20	64	45,52	0,13	0,13
120	@rivalhw	30	27	44	34,58	0,1	0,13
121	@cornerstone	33	29	33	30,47	0,09	0,13
122	@twinner	26	24	21	33,93	0,1	0,12
123	@cnts	78	60	29	13,72	0,04	0,12
124	@arunava	248	127	6	6,74	0,02	0,12
125	@berkah	104	74	17	11,24	0,03	0,12
126	@leesunmoo	12	9	94	88,94	0,25	0,12
127	@pfunk	14	13	35	63,21	0,18	0,12
128	@thing-2	36	32	100	22,86	0,06	0,11
129	@gentlebot	36	32	100	22,97	0,06	0,11
130	@michaeldavid	93	57	8	13,06	0,04	0,11
131	@onequality	22	22	41	35,72	0,1	0,11
132	@starkerz	14	12	90	64,01	0,18	0,11
133	@enlil	29	23	12	34,2	0,1	0,11
134	@nepalipahad	170	143	45	5,49	0,02	0,11
135	@mrainp420	480	362	3	2,08	0,01	0,11
136	@inventor16	33	17	29	44,72	0,13	0,11
137	@onceuponatime	7	7	100	105,22	0,3	0,11
138	@bullionstackers	74	64	13	11,13	0,03	0,1
139	@meesterboom	43	38	29	17,99	0,05	0,1
140	@steem-id	41	39	38	17,2	0,05	0,1
141	@jrcornel	13	9	94	76,78	0,22	0,1
142	@hwan100	45	42	26	15,76	0,04	0,1
143	@adol	14	9	100	77,48	0,22	0,1
144	@qurator	75	75	11	9,42	0,03	0,1
145	@woo7739	18	15	61	44,71	0,13	0,1
146	@darthnava	43	40	18	15,45	0,04	0,09
147	@jyp	31	18	30	34,2	0,1	0,09
148	@etcmike	49	38	14	16,24	0,05	0,09
149	@titusfrost	57	41	23	14,53	0,04	0,09
150	@bcc	17	14	43	46,68	0,13	0,09
151	@exyle	13	10	57	65,5	0,18	0,09
152	@abigail-dantes	21	20	43	30,81	0,09	0,09
153	@tincho	47	46	15	13,8	0,04	0,09
154	@rea	39	23	22	25,68	0,07	0,09
155	@robrigo	37	33	100	19,56	0,06	0,09
156	@exploretraveler	24	10	44	64,04	0,18	0,09
157	@oflyhigh	16	11	59	57,12	0,16	0,09
158	@randyclemens	518	494	4	1,24	0	0,09
159	@cmtzco	468	340	2	1,77	0	0,09
160	@lordoftruth	23	18	33	33,67	0,09	0,09
161	@pnc	94	64	11	8,52	0,02	0,08
162	@dan-bn	31	30	28	18,08	0,05	0,08
163	@grandpere	61	54	29	10,13	0,03	0,08
164	@staticinstance	18	16	37	33,46	0,09	0,08
165	@lichtblick	35	33	24	17,43	0,05	0,08
166	@jwolf	17	12	55	43,66	0,12	0,08
167	@amvanaken	178	148	20	3,52	0,01	0,08
168	@konami	26	20	35	29,39	0,08	0,08
169	@team	49	48	10	9,82	0,03	0,07
170	@steemdrive	25	22	48	21,18	0,06	0,07
171	@luzcypher	28	21	100	23,97	0,07	0,07
172	@gamerveda	414	373	2	1,29	0	0,07
173	@deanliu	19	15	81	32,2	0,09	0,07
174	@zahnspange	14	12	51	40,98	0,12	0,07
175	@nextgen622	22	17	71	28,32	0,08	0,07
176	@planter	15	15	29	30,33	0,09	0,07
177	@skuld2000	41	36	31	10,69	0,03	0,06
178	@randowhaletrail	191	131	5	2,96	0,01	0,06
179	@velourex	146	145	5	3,06	0,01	0,06
180	@steemstem	22	22	32	17,52	0,05	0,06
181	@joythewanderer	31	29	45	13,44	0,04	0,06
182	@mrwalt	103	58	11	7,59	0,02	0,06
183	@btu	8	8	99	50,62	0,14	0,06
184	@twinbraid	26	23	40	19,11	0,05	0,06
185	@t-bot	137	76	19	5,15	0,01	0,06
186	@cyan2017	35	33	40	12,37	0,03	0,06
187	@leesongyi	41	38	35	10,72	0,03	0,06
188	@raphaelle	222	182	9	2,28	0,01	0,06
189	@matt-a	9	7	73	59,48	0,17	0,06
190	@knircky	11	9	100	48,01	0,14	0,06
191	@jacor	62	51	19	8,7	0,02	0,06
192	@gindor	383	362	2	1,12	0	0,06
193	@kyriacos	40	25	30	17,72	0,05	0,06
194	@beanz	14	12	50	34,27	0,1	0,06
195	@spotlight	67	40	10	10,21	0,03	0,06
196	@boatymcboatface	19	16	34	28,1	0,08	0,06
197	@hjk96	25	22	50	15,07	0,04	0,05
198	@kusadasi	11	5	54	64,08	0,18	0,05
199	@kwak	18	14	76	22,78	0,06	0,05
200	@girina79	40	37	46	8,92	0,03	0,05

---

And from today we have some changes in the list. I took all vote bots (most of them are working like pay for vote) in the separate table. Because we can't call them effective curators. Their work depends on authors payments and activity.
If you know another bots in the list above please tell me about it.

№	Account	Votes	Authors	VAS(%)	Contr. (SBD)	Share %	Eff.
1	@minnowbooster	172	172	6	2417,12	6,81	59,93
2	@booster	103	88	8	592,68	1,67	7,52
3	@buildawhale	105	80	5	232,26	0,65	2,68
4	@randowhale	106	75	5	189,89	0,53	2,05
5	@minnowsupport	395	375	1	35,9	0,1	1,94
6	@randowhale0	86	68	5	147,51	0,42	1,45
7	@minnowpond	491	351	3	9,61	0,03	0,49
8	@msp-creativebot	88	60	10	34,95	0,1	0,3
9	@minnowhelper	29	23	26	28,43	0,08	0,09
10	@drotto	240	219	1	2,46	0,01	0,08

---

Now you know all these heroes. Their daily work gives hope to some authors, and some even a decent income. Their work attracts new authors in Steemit.

---

Information sources

All information is prepared by querying data from a SteemSQL - SQL database containing information from Steem's blockchain, as well as by calculations based on this data.

Special thanks to @arcange for SteemSQL and for the advice provided to me during the development of this project.