Positive news magazine #3

in #life8 years ago (edited)

Good news worth sharing.

The food sharing revolution

Olio is the best idea if you want to help others (and hate food waste).

While the focus recently has been on waste created by supermarkets or in production processes, of the 15 million tons of food thrown away each year in the UK, nearly half is chucked out by us at home.  

OLIO hopes to help solve this problem.  It's a free app connecting neighbours with each other and with local shops so surplus food and other items can be shared, not thrown away.

"Building a sense of community is one of the chief reasons people sign up for Olio" Tessa Cook

Read More

The surpising decline in violence

It may seem illogical and even obscene, given Iraq and Darfur, we are living in the most peaceful time in our species' existence.

Akon Providing Solar Lighting in Africa for 600 million people

Despite being best known for making pop music, Akon's decided to give filling dancefloors a break in favour of bringing solar energy to people living in rural Africa.

Read More

How Denmark is leading the way in teaching empathy to children

Contrary to popular belief, most people do care about the welfare of others. From an evolutionary standpoint, empathy is a valuable impulse that helps humans survive in groups. In American schools, this impulse has been lying dormant from a lack of focus. But in Denmark, a nation that has consistently been voted the happiest place in the world since Richard Nixon was president, children are taught about empathy from a young age both inside and outside of school.

Read More

Genes are selfish people are not

The word “altruism” was coined by Auguste Comte, the 19th-century social philosopher and early founder of sociology. It derives, in turn, from the Latin alter, for “other.” Although most people are grateful that altruism exists, evolutionary biologists have historically had trouble with it—or rather, trouble explaining altruism’s widespread existence in the natural world. 

The problem is that natural selection is not conducive to benefiting “others.” After all, natural selection is quintessentially a selfish process, in which winning—or at least staying in the game longer than others—is the bottom line.

Evolution proceeds by the differential reproduction of genes, so the challenge is to explain the persistence of a trait that, by definition, leads to an increase in the success of another while not increasing the success of oneself. Selfishness should defeat altruism every time, at least at the gene level.

“Does Altruism Exist?” presents a simple arithmetic model purporting to show how altruism can readily evolve by group selection.  From there, it is easy to see that group selection “works” and that altruism can win out over selfishness, even though individual altruists are less fit than their selfish colleagues.

Although group selection remains exceedingly unlikely as a mechanism driving evolution in non-human organisms, Mr. Wilson may be on the right track for one particular group: human beings. 

Read More

Previous editions 1, 2

Sort:  

Hi, unfortunately this post is a copy-past from several sources.
Possible sources:
http://goodfoodoxford.org/blog/the-food-sharing-revolution-will-be-digitised/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/food-and-drink/features/feed-thy-neighbour-theres-an-app-for-that---xanthe-clay-tried-ou/
http://www.wsj.com/articles/genes-are-selfish-people-are-not-1434144343

Copying/Pasting articles without permission is copyright infringement. If you want to share a news story, simply link to the source, and include your original commentary, and possibly small quotes from source. Copy paste is discouraged by the community, and may result in action from the cheetah bot.

Please, consider writing original posts,
thank you!

@steemcleaners

Hi @aleksandraz, I guess I need some education here. My intention is to share good news stories to inspire. I clearly link out to the source of the original articles and used only the main points as text - a small minority of the article- to provide context for someone to read back to the source article itself. Can you help define this a bit more. Is it that I have to rewrite all the content I see, then link back to the article...? Help!

You need to add your own thoughts and comments and use quotes from the source. Example:

Your intro, thoughts, comments on the article.

Quote from the article like this.

OLIO hopes to help solve this problem. It's a free app connecting neighbours with each other and with local shops so surplus food and other items can be shared, not thrown away.
Source

Thoughts on next article

Quote from article & Source.

Add photos where needed.

Hope this helps! ☙

clear thank you