DAILY STEEM REPORT APRIL, 13TH ( STEEM 0.16462$ )
After yesterdays suggest from @steevc and as Steemit start to do marketing, I decided to put daily unique visitors and daily Pageviews on the Report. I get these stats from here: http://steemit.com.hypestat.com
What you guys think about it?
I'm obviously in favour. It looks like the bots were only active for a day. Could it be one person controlling them all?
I've been looking at the Mastodon microblogging service. It's been around about 6 months and has passed Steemit in accounts, but then it's been hyped by the media in the last week. It shows people are eager to try new things. We need Steemit to have the same sort of buzz.
I know that it is one person ( I even know who it is ) but I don't know why he turn it on and off all the time....
mastodon.social receives about 1,000 unique visitors and 3,100 (3.10 per visitor) page views per day which should earn about $8.00/day from advertising revenue. Estimated site value is $3,473.46. According to Alexa Traffic Rank mastodon.social is ranked number 365,500 in the world and 0.0002% of global Internet users visit it. Site is hosted in Frankfurt, 05, 60438, Germany and links to network IP address 139.59.213.147.
But looks like they have way less visitors per day.....
You cannot really compare as they have lots of instances running on different sites. It's like people here using busy.org and other sites to access the blockchain.
good point.
This definitely has truth to it. I don't know about all the bots, but 564 of them are controlled by one person. How do I know? Because the first time I came here for a paid offer (account registration), and in its statistics is visible the number of completed tasks.
Good Plan.
More information is always useful.
I like the format you use to display it.
What is with these on-again-off-again bots?
I have no idea....
For comparison: http://golos.io.hypestat.com/
This post has been ranked within the top 80 most undervalued posts in the second half of Apr 13. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $0.48 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.
See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: Apr 13 - Part II. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.
If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.