You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: @Grumpycat answers @Wackou, (Grumpycat picture inside)
I can't even praise @themarkymark for being a responsible bot owner while letting him know he's hijacking the conversation with his $3.80 upvote on a comment that's now irrelevant after my edit.
@Wackou's SP is still being used for indiscriminate censorship via @Drakos via @the-resistance's bot made by @r351574nc3
ahahahaha, amazing meme.
D.
Yeah. I can predict you would edit it. It was unclear so I spoke up. It was voted up so your
slandermistake is noted.They way you put it made it look opposite of the truth. But by all means flag my comment and upvote yours. I really don’t give a shit, I just care when people
purposelymake me look bad.I could have equally told you to remove your vote after the clarification and waited but I know you're a big boy and wouldn't make a fuss about it.
Want to go out for a tea?
Don't like Tea or beer, how about Mudslides and shots?
You know the two of you could make a hell of a pair.
@themarkymark could solve your problem @grumpycat.
Care to talk about it in discord with us?
The bot does discriminate - every identical spam comment left after you indiscriminately flag a post, is flagged. Result is that any indiscrimnate element is introduced by your own action.
Flagging spam does not qualify as censorship.
Flagging all posts that use a promotional service that you happen to disagree with, is censorship. It is the same as removing a journalist's salary and burning his articles, all copies of TIME magazine on the book shelves, because he published an article in TIME Magazine, and you disagree with TIME magazine.
Oh please.