Healthcare economics, reform.
The resources necessary to provide people with health care are scarce. They have to be rationed/allocated through one mechanism or another. Proclaiming health care is a right and that everyone will have insurance (or get care) doesn't change that fact.
The question is what process will be used to allocate those resources. Trying to provide them at zero monetary cost only means you shift the cost elsewhere, whether it's time spent waiting for services and procedures or time and resources spent engaging in what the Soviets used to call "blat" - bribing/rent-seeking to avoid wait times etc. Without markets and prices, resource allocation ends up depending on the aristocracy of pull. Is that what you want?
The other big advantage of markets and prices is that among all of the ways we have of deciding which demanders will get the limited supply, it's the only one that has a built-in process for expanding said supply. Prices and profits not only decide who gets what, they encourage the production of more of the goods and services at cheaper prices.
You can ration resources by lottery, by lining up, by connections, or by Fight Club. The problem with all of them is that none encourage people to supply more resources. They all tacitly assume supply is manna from heaven.
If you want to encourage more goods/services, and at progressively lower cost, you need markets and prices. Whatever the drawbacks of markets and prices, that's a HUGE advantage.
Screaming that health care is a right does not change social scientific reality. It's a point my progressive friends committed to the "reality-based community" and science-based public policy should pay more attention to.
You cannot have lower costs, expanding supply, and universal coverage. At best, pick two.
i agree with you bro @honeybee
To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.
Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvote this reply.
Fight Club style that's the way.
I bet Brad Pitt knows about healthcare.
P.S. Do you have a bromance brewing with a certain somebody. Just the vibe I am getting from subtle messages and hints here and there.
Bromance avec toi?
MMMMM certainly sounds tempting.
Healthcare in my country (Australia) gets stuffed up by bad management. Government hospitals and clinics in particular are very poorly run. A common argument is that they don't have enough money. I don't believe it is the amount of money but how that money is being used.
I see three critical areas are:
Most of the focus is on treatment, some focus on cure, and almost no attention to prevention. Forking out a ton of money on treatment is a massive drain. Lots and lots of sick people. These people require more staff, larger facilities, more drugs, etc, etc...
A far less expensive approach is to focus on prevention. Healthy living, eating healthy, exercising regularly, and natural remedies (lemons are good for lots of things). Parents should consider starting their children out the right way. Let them know that healthy food can taste better than the stuff demented clowns give out (no offense Ronald).
To sum it up. Improve healthcare by preventing people from getting sick in the first place.
P.S. Are you still a smoker?
It all comes down to the massive degree of consumer fraud being committed which characterizes the perception of inefficiency of the health care system. Prevention is the least of anyones concern because nobody getting sick means a whole sector becomes more or less redundant.
I am of the belief that diseases such as Cancer , HIV already have cures, but how would the big drug companies make money if not presented with a constant supply of incurable patients?
I am a social smoker and proud. Moderation is key.
Totally agree with you @honeybee. There is no money in prevention. We owe it to ourselves to stay healthy and have greater awareness.
In regards to cancer, I think there are many forms of alternative medicine that is quite effective but do not see the light because they will hurt the profits of big pharma. In regards to HIV, I'm not buying the whole monkey story. There a lot of nasty games going on behind the scenes.
I have no problem with your smoking. We are all free to make our own decisions. I think in your case, it is definitely an informed decision. I worry more about those with addictions and dependencies on drugs, alcohol etc. If you like an occasional relaxing smoke with a brandy or enjoy a few puffs after a great orgasm just for that icing on the cake, go for it.