How To Enslave the World

in #politics8 years ago (edited)

Imagine a fairly primitive tribe of people living on a big island somewhere, getting along with each other pretty well and managing to thrive and prosper. Then along comes an outsider—a nasty guy who is not big and strong, but who is very clever. He wants to be the boss so he can take whatever he wants and do whatever he wants, and basically control the rest of them. But how could he possibly do that? The people of the tribe hugely outnumber him, and they will probably naturally distrust him since he is a stranger. He can’t acquire power over them by brute force, and what possible reason would they have to willingly give him such power?

Fast forward on our hypothetical island a few years, and now the “outsider” is the king of the tribe. He gets whatever he wants. The biggest members of the tribe act as his guards and enforcers. His every whim is called “law,” and any who resist him are demonized and attacked, not just by his hired guards, but by most of the other people in the tribe. They fear him, some hate him, but nearly all obey him, and pay tribute to him.

If you think that that could never happen in real life … turn on CNN.

It already did.

The crooks in Washington, DC—the ones who call themselves “the United States government”—are vastly outnumbered and outgunned by the people they tax and regulate. The American people don’t trust politicians, or like them, and yet the people keep handing over ridiculous sums of money to them—trillions of dollars every year. And most people keep complying with all manner of stupid, destructive, unjustified laws and regulations. Worst of all, it is the people themselves who enforce the will of the politicians on each other. The guy who will wipe out your bank account if you don’t pay your “fair share” to the IRS, or the guy who will kidnap you at gunpoint if you possess a plant without the politicians’ permission, is not a president or a congressman; he is an average Joe. He is a fellow victim of the ruling class, who also does their bidding, forcibly punishing any fellow subject who disobeys the masters.

How could such a situation ever come into existence? Simple. “Politics.” The crooks in DC know what the “outsider” on the island knew: if you want to control people, and you can’t do it by brute force alone, then you need to scare them, divide them, manipulate and deceive them, and always tell them that the way for them to be safe, the way to have the innocent protected and the wicked defeated, the way to make the world what it should be, is to give YOU lots and lots of money and power—power over everything and everyone, including them. To make this scam work, you must constantly use divide-and-conquer tactics, pitting various groups against each other, so they all distrust and resent one another, and all clamor to be first in line to throw more power at you in the hopes that you will use that power to serve their interests and harm their enemies. Never let up on your message of fear-mongering, so that they are scared of all sorts of dangers—poverty, crime, invasion, disease, etc.—to the point where they will willingly, even eagerly, discard their own freedom in exchange for loyal subservience to you, in the hopes that you will save them. (It doesn’t particularly matter whether you scare them with threats that are real, exaggerated, or just plain made up, as long as they believe them.)

Every successful tyrant in history has convinced his subjects that they, the people, would be the ones to benefit from him having power—that all of his authoritarian control-freak plans were for “the people” and “the nation,” and that the oppression inflicted upon the public was “for their own good.” Become a master at telling that lie, and you will soon have large numbers of serfs who not only obey your every whim and throw massive amounts of money at you, but who will hate and attack anyone who doesn’t. Do it right, and your human livestock will be meek, obedient, and will be existentially terrified of the idea of life WITHOUT you "in charge."

If you doubt this—if you think people would never be that gullible, that foolish, that easy to manipulate—just browse through some of the comments under any voluntaryist article on Steemit, or video on YouTube, or article on Facebook, and you will find no shortage of people expressing existential terror—complete with dire predictions, emotional tantrums, and even insults and condemnations—at the mere suggestion that maybe we don’t need a political ruling class forcibly extorting and controlling the rest of us “for our own good.”

Sort:  

Daily, fresh Larken Rose pieces? Steemit is making my life complete :)

If you react emotionally to new ideas, without thinking them through, you may want to consider that the issues lie with you and not the ideas.

Easier said than done, much to my own dismay. It's a sign of emotional maturity to be able to take a step back and evaluate with a cool head. Unfortunately, several people never reach that point. Scaring people into forfeiture of resources is big business. I think we all know that it's not "too big to fail", though.

And I see that terror every day, as you said, everywhere I read any comments against the notion that each man should be his own ruler and be free to defend himself when someone else decides to rule him too. More disheartening for me has been the vigor with which your average moralizer will pontificate about the virtues of love and self-sacrifice and helping your fellow man AND that the state must crush those who disagree and resist handing over their property. We fans of your work eagerly await "The Mirror" in the expectation that with it we can turn those vigorous moralizers into logically consistent ones, at least.

So far, of the faults I do have, failure to speak my mind has not been one of them.

Keep up the great work, Larken!

I like to ask people people if they support slavery. They all respond with a "no", of course. I then ask "If slavery is forcibly taking 100% of a person's earnings, at what percentage is it not slavery?"

Slaves had no earnings. They were kidnapped from their families and given no choice in their daily activities. They could be killed on a whim, for fun, or as an example. Comparing taxes to slavery betrays your grave misunderstanding of the inequities of slavery.

Telos, exercise your natural right to provide for your needs (food sheltet, clothing) through goods or services without paying taxes, make sure the gov't is aware you are living free and see what happens. (spoiler alert...you will be caged, or if you resist being kidnapped for caging, killed.) and how many ARE killed just on a whim or as an example by the modern whip crackers (law enforcement officers)? WAKE UP MAN!

Try not paying taxes and see how "better" your government behaves towards you. Won't be much different than a slave master.
Governments kill their own citizens with impunity all the time.
https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/20TH.HTM

Their would-be earnings are the product of their labor, which all go to their master. Their labor would produce earnings if they weren't slaves.

Earnings are almost never tied to labor unless you're the business owner. Earning are what you agree to receive when you accept a job offer. That step simply did not exist for slaves. They never had any choice, they were literally forced to work. By contrast you only pay taxes if you choose to work or choose to own property. Key word there being "choose."

@lifeworship:

So your first link is by a guy who also seems to think chemtrails are a problem. That doesn't inspire much faith in his numbers.

Meanwhile here's a graph showing measles cases were slowly lowering but had a sharp drop-off when the vaccine was introduced: http://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/graph-us-measles-cases

I'll also add this chart of deaths from measles that, if you drew a trend line would probably look more like your guy's graph: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/vsrates1940_60.pdf (page 85)

So here's my interpretation: Your guy used deaths from measles instead of actual incidents of measles, and there were fewer deaths because hygiene, medicine and other factors improved. In fact, here's a nice long blog post addressing exactly those points: http://www.harpocratesspeaks.com/2014/06/pre-vaccine-declines-in-measles.html

Now, as to your polio vaccine argument... it does appear that a virus in the vaccine could cause cancer. However they fixed that in 1961:

The presence of SV40 in monkey cell cultures used in the preparation of the polio vaccine from 1955 through 1961 - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10472327

How would you feel about a tax on having children?

Basically, humans need to work and own property to live. Therefore the choice is:
a) die
b) live as a slave.
Which is not much of a choice.

ran out of replies, i'll answer your false choice here.
i don't engage in activities that kill children, honestly, what kind of a question is that? though pro vaccinators statistically, demonstrably, provably do. here :
http://genesgreenbook.com/resources/obamsawin/ImmunizationGraphs-RO2009.pdf
is an article that the pro vaccination people never talk about. it shows the decrease in infectious disease, due to improvements in hygiene and sanitation, took place BEFORE the introduction of vaccines. vaccines didn't save us. in fact with the statistically provable death and debilitation rates of the use of vaccines, i'd say that your opinions are more of a threat to children than mine. Again, though, this is not an issue of whether or not these demonstrable poisons are safe to inject into the veins of children at ever increasing rates to pad the bottom line of the pharmaceutical companies, it is about the rights of the individual to choose accurate data when deciding what to inject into THEIR children's bodies or not.
here is an additional article on the favorite fallback argument of pro vaccination advocates, polio :
http://www.thinktwice.com/Polio.pdf
i do admire your tenacity. i wish you would read the data and join the informed. we would love to have you as an ally.

telos already believes that the state owns your children and can do what it wants with them, and when confronted with the fact resorts to false choices and accusations that someone who believes in freedom wants to kill their and other people's children. see here:
https://steemit.com/health/@mxu111/stunning-blow-to-anti-vaxxer-parents#@telos/re-lifeworship-re-mxu111-stunning-blow-to-anti-vaxxer-parents-20160817t020105373z

You never did answer that question, and you're completely mischaracterizing what I said. I never even remotely stated that the state owns your children. I was pointing out that you would like to make a decision that could kill them. But hey, have fun stalking me to trash talk me!

You are correct, it's not fair to compare outright slavery with citizenship. On a scale of 1 to 100 on the freedom scale, slave = 1, citizen = 2, so twice as good to be a citizen.. It's a very good trick, to give slaves a much larger area to roam, and call the plantation a nation. Look at how much better cows feel when you let them out of a cage and limit them to an acre.

So it's unfair to compare to slavery, and then you immediately compare to slavery again.

No, you're right. You're totally a slave. A man whips you and forces you to work, chooses what work you do, and fucks your wife every day then beats you up again for some fun. "The man" forces you to live in a tiny hut too, right? Oh but I guess you admit the hut he forces you to live in is a little larger now.

What? You choose where you live? You chose what to do for a living? No one whips you or fucks your wife? Wow, it's almost like you're totally not a slave.

Some slaves were allowed to leave the plantation to work for money. They had to give a percentage of their earnings to their master back at home.

And even slavery wasn't taking %100 of earnings, slaves were provided food, shelter, security, etc.

Larkin asked that people not upvote unless the article is worth someone elses time to read it. I haven't read anything yet from Larkin that isn't worth someone elses time to read. Upvoted.

Maybe I should post a really bad casserole recipe, just to make sure people are paying attention.

I love casserole! 😂

In a blender, mix half a dozen big macs and a large fry. Spread into a cake dish and bake at 500 degrees until black

LOL! Im paying attention Larkin!! Don't bring out the tuna casserole!!!

This post brings me images of your "how to be a crook" animation. Your way of eloquently explaining the basic principals we should hold true in this world have never run against my principals and likely never will. That is precisely why we deem a lot of attention seekers as gadfly. When you sum up exactly exactly what is wrong with society and include lines of reasoning that are so supportive, what else is there to say?
I agree with you have some free stock in the next social currency, thats about it. Im no better than the next man when I say your message has evolved to include a wider audience, and while these posts resonate with all of us who share a vision decentralized future, it might be good to post some more specific posts with less content in order to have an honest discussion here. I know I'm game, but it might be a good idea to do it before new users become successful and divert attention away from serious topics. Thank you for writing and all the work you have done and are doing to spread information.

This is basically the recipe mom made. We called it Tuna Slop and loved it

What he actually wrote was, "if they think it's something other people should read (and if they want me rewarded for posting it), THEN up-vote it and share it all over the place."
Personally, I think an article or comment is worthy of upvote if I like it, regardless whether I think others will.

Even the word "government" is an insult to our intelligence.. Government is for children and the mentally challenged.
The concept of controlling other people is corrupting us, following our psychopathic "leaders"/self-proclaimed owners bad example.

NO! SLAVERY IS FOR - NO ONE! - not even CHILDREN! nor the MENTALLY CHALLENGED!!

Government keeps us children. Becoming an adult means outgrowing the need to be taken care of and taking the necessary steps to reclaim responsibility for ones self and one's own actions.

So simple, but so many don't/won't see it.

You can tag in the body of your postings. #larkenrose and anything else. I'd also include #Steem, #Steemit, and #truth.

Another good one, Larken. I realy like your writing style. Keep up the great work. Now steemit is turning into a great source where to find articles coming from anarchist thinkers. And that's a good thing...

Yep. Lots of my favourite anarchists are here.

Hey Larken, have you seen School Sucks Podcast's video on the dangers of abandoning government? It's very tongue and cheek but it does an awesome job at making the point. Seems to have a lot of the same themes as you've described here. video

I clicked the link and watched the video and nearly died! It was hilarious! Which, of course, means that almost anyone that it was intended to reach simply won't understand 😕

I Know right! Unfortunately you are probably correct. If you don't already listen to it i'd suggest their podcast though. It is great

Yeah, it's awesome, but I think the sarcasm might fly right over the heads of a lot of indoctrinated statists.

Hey, Larken, you understand what's going on here, right? :)

That "money" has no LEGAL strings attached to it......you won't be able to DECLARE it as Revenu/Gain, right? :D

DEBT-FREE MONEY !!!!! :D

I'm debating an ancom right now, it's almost easier to debate a statist