You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: [공지] @proxy.token 증인 투표 운영 방침(@proxy.token witness voting policy)
SP 파워다운 기간을 3일~7일로 단축할 의향이 있는가?
(Are you willing to shorten the SP power-down period to three to seven days from current period? )
Yes. Shortest should be 7 days in my opinion.
스팀 블록체인의 다운보팅을 제거할 의향이 있는가?
(Are you willing to remove down-voting policy of STEEM blockchain? )
Downvotes should be able to be removed from communities with SMTs. Not from the main chain. There's a compromise to be had there.
스팀 블록체인에 스마트 컨트랙트를 도입할 의향이 있는가?
(Are you willing to introduce smart contact into the STEEM block chain? )
Yes. Would you support a dev proposal for such work?
유료 구독 모델을 도입할 의향이 있는가?
(Are you willing to introduce a paid subscription model?)
Potentially. I don't know what you mean by this but increasing revenue for users is a good thing to me.
@sct @proxy.token
With much respect to the Korean community,
I agree with these terms too.
When there is a community, we can discuss anything together.
But we can't negotiate when Justin Sun controls everything. He will do whatever he wants.
I hope you stay with the community.
Same answers for me as well.
I understand downvotes create a lot of concern for many users on the platform, and I have had friends leave the platform due to what they thought was unfair downvoting. I think solving this via community moderators may end up being a great way to prevent this abuse while still providing away to ensure the rewards pool is protected and used for valuable content instead of bots or accounts trying to extract it without providing value.
I would like to know more about what types of smart contract functionality you are interested in.
I'm also curious to know more about the paid subscription model might look like, who would benefit from it and more. Maybe a community with a built in registration and subscription fee?
Good option as the trouble of locking funds indefinitely can be addressed. May need to change or investigate the post payouts economics to decide the exact number of days IMHO.
Agree to @netuoso
Absolutely and the options explored by DanL should be investigated. There were discussions regarding Smart Contracts in the past. There was some work using a programming language called WREN also was done. Refer : https://steemit.com/blockchain/@dantheman/a-better-approach-to-turing-complete-smart-contracts
More details will be needed. That being said, attempts to make the chain self-sustainable without coin sales like what was going on will be great. There should be sustainable mechanisms to create revenue. Any reasonable means to achieve is welcome.
I agree with this comment and it is my stance as witness as well.
I agree with this
Comment and it is my stance
As witness as well.
- therealwolf
I'm a bot. I detect haiku.
I am also in agreement with everything said above.
Fully agree with everything Netuoso said, except I would be more in favor of a 4 week power down unless changes can be made to further protect hacked accounts. Right now account recovery is very questionable due to the state of Steemit Inc right now.
I also have don't understand the scenario for a paid subscription model and would need clarification on that.
I agree with everything said here.
다운보팅 학살자는 여기 얼굴 드밀지 마라.