You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: SLC S23 Week4 || Quadrilaterals
| Task | Comment | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Parallelogram | Some properties are inherent to all quadrilaterals, so they should not be listed specifically for a parallelogram. In the demonstration, the parallelogram looks neat but too small (with a lot of white space). The scale should have been increased. | 1.7/1.8 |
| 2. Trapezoid | The demonstration of the midline length is unnecessary, especially since the base lengths are not provided (nor are they needed). Among the angles, only right angles should have been shown. When demonstrating the midline, it should be noted that CF = FA and DG = GB. In the demonstration of the isosceles trapezoid, only points A and B move, which does not show different instances of an isosceles trapezoid but merely scales the given one. | 1.6/1.8 |
| 3. Rhombus | The rhombus takes on different shapes, but it would look better if it were demonstrated with a fixed center, as I showed in the lesson. | 1.7/1.8 |
| 4. Rectangle | A nice rectangle, but like the demonstration of the isosceles trapezoid, it does not change its proportions. During the demonstration, point C should have also been moved, as I see the construction allowed for it. Again, only the specific characteristics of the rectangle should be listed. A rectangle is a quadrilateral and even a parallelogram, so properties that are not unique to the rectangle should not be mentioned. | 1.7/1.8 |
| 5. Square | A square definitely does not change its proportions, as that is its nature. Regarding the 'non-essential' properties, I mentioned that above | 1.6/1.8 |
| Point for aesthetics and neatness. | 0.9/1 |
Total: 9.2 / 10