Peer review of ideology

Source

Academic peer review, called arbitration, is defined as the process of subjecting an academic work (research, essay, study or dissertation) to a careful examination by experts in the field of work before authorizing the publication of the work in a specialized journal. The result of the review is either acceptance, rejection or conditional acceptance of the review. An academic review requires a panel of qualified specialists to conduct a neutral review. Although peer reviews are essential in academia, they have been criticized for being ineffective, slow and incomprehensible. One of the main reasons for the denial of this approach is the peer review failure issues faced by NASA and the Harvard-Smithsonian Center.

As is known, it is the first source of any scientific truth to be published, and its research has thus acquired a high degree of credibility, and some even cast sanctity on such research as a home revelation.
However, the process of impartiality is not free from submission to the ideology of researchers, and even complicity in falsifying scientific facts as a service to their intellectual creed.

Here are some of the falsified research on evolutionary Darwinist doctrine, taken from an article by Dr. Anas Abu Hayam:

1

_{藤井 善隆 Fujii Yoshitaka Wikipedia}

One scholar, Yoshitaka Fujii, has published 172 counterfeit papers on peer-reviewed journals (Peer Review)

2

In 2006, Dr. Lawrence K. Altman of The New York Times wrote that the peer review system had been severely weakened and allowed the publication of flawed or even falsified studies: _{Recent disclosures of fraudulent or flawed studies in medical and scientific journals have called into question as never before the merits of their peer-review system. ... Virtually every major scientific and medical journal has been humbled recently by publishing findings that are later discredited. The flurry of episodes has led many people to ask why authors, editors and independent expert reviewers all failed to detect the problems before publication read more}

3

As a result of these criticisms, this 2012 New York Times article noted that scientists are becoming increasingly skeptical of the peer review process: http://www.nytimes.com/…/open-science-challenges-journal-tr…

4

In a scientific article from the science daily website, they say: "After 10 years of research, the traditional Peer review papers are not enough to trust the quality of the information! ).
_{Traditional peer review is not enough to ensure data quality amid the recent boom in scientific research findings, according to results of a 10-year collaboration between the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and five technical journals read more}

If magazines that can be considered a scientific journal (peer review) are falsifying science, how can a non-scientific Wikipedia, which is not subject to revision?

Scholars of evolution have also falsified embryos, fossils, etc. to prove to the world that they are monkeys.

---

• 1

Ernst Haeckel ¹, a German philosopher and biologist, presented theories of Charles Darwin in Germany and developed a theory on the origin of man. He published a "scandal of falsification of embryonic stages" to reinforce his theory of embryonic evolution.
_{Haeckel's Embryos: Fraud Rediscovered
Using modern techniques, a British researcher has photographed embryos like those pictured in the famous, century-old drawings by Ernst Haeckel--proving that Haeckel's images were falsified. Haeckel once admitted to his peers that he doctored the drawings, but that confession was forgotten
Review the scientific journal (science mag)}

And to listen to the justifications of Darwinist scholars to cover up this crime and falsify the truth !!
Fraudsters and science forgery !!

• 2

Nature magazine said the dinosaur was cleared of the title of "grandfather of birds" after it was forged for years: Read the full article

• 3

The trick of the pilt-down-man who proved to be fake:
https://thefactofcreation.blogspot.com/2012/08/piltdown-man-fraud-the.html

• 4

And Ork's donkey, who found his bones and called him Ork's man and presented him as the missing link
http://www.halleethehomemaker.com/2010/09/creation-darwinian-evolutionary-frauds-pt-x

• 5

After some evolutionists said that some kind of fish has been extinct about 80 million years ago, that is, since the time of the dinosaurs, and this is evidence of evolution !! But it is a forgery where the fish that supposedly extinct were discovered.

Press hereTo see the rare original document in Miss Marjorie's line written at the moment of discovery reveals the moment and descriptions of this object .

References:

1. https://www.labnews.co.uk/features/peer-review/
2. http://www.halleethehomemaker.com/2010/09/creation-darwinian-evolutionary-frauds-pt-x/
3. https://thefactofcreation.blogspot.com/2012/08/piltdown-man-fraud-the.html
4. http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110727/full/news.2011.443.html
5. nytimes
6. nytimes
7. science daily
8. science mag
9. pbs.org

THANKS FOR VISIT MY BLOG

PEACE AND LOVE .

_{©ELQANBOUI ABDELLATIF @steeimran}