Can Older Graphics Cards still perform in Modern Games?.. 3 GPU's and Benchmarks! - PC Tech - Part 17

in #gaming7 years ago

PC owners like to get the most out of the hardware they have bought and want to extend its life for as long as possible, but can they cope with modern games?

crysis_3_graphics_cards_review.jpg
Image Source

In this post. I aim to answer that question by testing 3 graphics cards from 2014-2015.


Looking at the Steam Hardware Survey the Nvidia GTX 750 Ti is the most used GPU today, and less than 10% of gamers are using today's equivalent. So this made me wonder... how good are older cards at gaming today? So I grabbed a few GPUs, downloaded a couple of synthetic benchmarks and installed a mix of 3 games that have there own benchmarks built into them.

The PC I will be using to test this out on will be my trusty old system that was built about 4 years ago, so about the same age as the GPUs I will be testing and a good average for the age of computers PC gamers are using as the most common operating system is windows 7 (again, source from the Steam Hardware Survey).

So my Test Bench looks like this.

CPUAMD FX - 8350 OC @ 4.35Ghz
RAMRampage 16Gb DDR3 OC @2200Mhz
MotherboardGigabyte 970A - DS3P
Power SupplyDual PSU total 600 Watts.
Drive1Tb Corsair SSD
CoolingCorsair H45 CPU - 2x 200mm and 4x 120mm case fans.

The GPU's I will be using are...

AMD Radeon R9 270x Powercolour PCS+
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti EVGA FTW
Nvidia Geforce GTX 770 Asus DirectCU II OC edition

PowerColor_PCSplus_R9_270X_02.jpg
R9 270x Image Source


02-big-evga-gerorce-gtx750ti-ftw-acx-cooling.jpg
GTX 750 Ti Image Source


ASUSGTX770DCIIOC4.jpg
GTX 770 Image Source


So for the synthetic tests I used Unigine Valley and there new benchmark software, Superposition.
For the Game benchmarks I used Rise of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 2016 and GTA V.
With the exception of Superposition, all benchmarks were at Maximum graphical settings at 1440p (I have a new 120 hrz 42” monitor to play with, Like a giddy child). Superposition was set to the 1080p high setting as it is a very demanding benchmark and the scores on the extreme setting were just to much for the older GPUs.


unigine-logo.png


Rise_of_the_Tomb_Raider_logo.png


hitman_logo.jpg


vfull.png


Here is the graph I ended up with.

Capture.PNG

Lets start by looking at the R9 270x.
In the synthetic benchmarks, we can see that the 270x did very poorly with Valley resulting in just under 30FPS and superposition at a dismal 21FPS.
The game benchmarks were no better with Tomb raider resulting in 26FPS but that included a lot of stuttering and frames dropping constantly. In game the card performs OK at these settings but the frame drops are too frequent. GTA was only just a little better at 28FPS but was overall smooth and just about playable. Hitman yielded the best score for the 270x as Hitman is a sponsored AMD game and it produced a very smooth and playable 32FPS average with the odd dip to the high 20s.

Looking at the most used GPU, the GTX 750 Ti overall performed much better.
Unigine valley saw an average framer ate of 53FPS and it looked very buttery, while the Superposition bench performed the worst of all the cards at only 16FPS, very stuttery, even for a synthetic benchmark.
With Rise of the tomb raider, the 750 ti hit an average of 33 FPS and in game is very playable with no dropped frames or stuttering. GTA V is known to perform best on Nvidia cards and this is no exception with an average of 58 FPS, a great score and exceptional playability. Hitman on the other hand performed OK but not great at just 32FPS, same score as the 270x. It could be better, but it could be a lot worse.

And finally the GTX 770, a couple of steps up from the 750 ti.
In the Valley bench, this card got the highest score of all 3 cards with just over 50FPS average and superposition saw a 31FPS average and the both looked beautiful.
In Tomb Raider, the GTX ends up on top again with an average of 36FPS, not much more than the 750 ti, but a good improvement and you can see how much smoother it is.
GTA V was the highest scoring out of all the cards with a huge leap over the 750 ti at an average of 72FPS and in game the difference is notable and looks so much better.
Hitman saw the highest frame rate out of the 3 cards too with a good score of 38FPS which was also buttery smooth. It did dip a little to the mid 20's, but overall a good score.


1387871-rise-of-the-tomb-raider.jpg
Image Source - Tech Mojo

But what do all these benchmarks mean?
Well it shows that when the cards are pushed to their absolute limit, they can perform reasonably well at the 30FPS mark which is what most console gamers have to put up with. But if you tweaked the setting enough, you can easily play games at 60+ FPS which will give you a much smoother image and a more immersive experience over all, which is what most PC gamers aim for.
All these games are playable at a good frame rate once the graphical settings have been set to accommodate what your card can handle. I've had the 270x in my machine for a long time and at a mix of high to very high, it can produce gameplay in the region of 60 – 80 FPS with no dropped frames. This is just to showcase what the cards will do when everything is turned on and set to its highest level.
maxresdefault.jpg
Image Source - Tech Mojo

If you are thinking of buying an entry level or enthusiast graphics card new. You may want to consider buying an older card but a few steps up. What I mean is, if you are thinking of spending $150 on a GTX 1050 Ti, you could buy a GTX 970 or GTX 780 Ti which was the top end card 4 years ago and performs much better than the entry level card your thinking about buying.
On average, the cards in this test cost less than £85 GBP, $100 USD each on the used market. So when compared to the modern equivalent, the price to performance is incredible.
the-new-hitman-game-may-prove-to-be-the-pinnacle-of-the-series-123-body-image-1455103938-size_1000.jpg
Image Source - Tech Mojo

My better half is chuffed with her new GTX 770 as it performs much better that the 750 Ti she has been using for the past couple of years.
When I was thinking about buying a 1050 Ti, I did a little research into comparing it with older cards and I ended up getting the 770 as it performs better.

Graphic card prices are starting to normalize after the mining boom which drove prices up so the second hand market is full of bargains waiting to be sold.

I hope this post has been helpful and your decision making is a little easier now.

Thanks for reading.

Don't Forget to Upvote, ReSteem and Follow for more content like this!

#tech mojo footer.png
Stu @TechMojo

Join the chat TechMojo Discord Channel

Follow us TechMojo OnG Social Page

Like us TechMojo Facebook Page

Follow us TechMojo Twitter

Sort:  

I have 5 years old PC and the games I play are all old by today's standards...

But it works some of the modern games, very slow but bearable when you consider how expensive buying a new Graphic Card is...

great post. dear @techmojo & thanx you so much for sharing . this post now #resteem & upvote done .

cheers buddy

Older cards tend to still perform quite well!
Until recently enough I was running an AMD 6670 (2GB) and it did work pretty well.

I eventually upgraded to an AMD 470, just before the Ethereum mining crazy killed prices, so I was really glad to get one at the recommended retail price, but even now the old card is used in a backup system and can still flex it's muscles in the majority of games I play.

yup. i was late when it came to buying a new card, it was in the middle of the ether boom, fortunately i was given the r9 by a friend which performed slightly better than the old 7950. although that card is long dead after some silly overclocking experiments and puffs of blue smoke made the room smell like failure.

Still rocking a GTX660 that I bought in 2013, hasn't been able to run any AAA games released in the last 1 1/2 years but still performs reasonably well considering how old it is. Should probably think about upgrading but it's at the point now where i need to upgrade the whole system.

you and me both dude. i do have plans on a major upgrade....
A PC in a desk, click to have a look at the 3d renders i have done

I'm still running an AMD 6770. It is definitely insufficient for new games.

i dunno, i was running a 7950 up until a year ago. if you are thinking of changing, defiantly consider the used market first.

The @OriginalWorks bot has determined this post by @techmojo to be original material and upvoted(1.5%) it!

ezgif.com-resize.gif

To call @OriginalWorks, simply reply to any post with @originalworks or !originalworks in your message!