You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: 5 Conspiracies That Snopes.com Mysteriously Hasn't Ever Mentioned...

in #threespeak • 5 years ago

Oh they definitely do that, yes. There's also the case where they were caught changing the narrative after apparently being bought off:
https://foodbabe.com/do-you-trust-snopes-you-wont-after-reading-how-they-work-with-monsanto-operatives/

5 years ago in #threespeak by
$0.85
  • Past Payouts $0.85, 0.00 TRX
  • - Author $0.64, 0.00 TRX
  • - Curators $0.21, 0.00 TRX
14 votes
Reply 2
Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     5 years ago (edited)

    I've not been a fan of Snopes going all the way back to the Bush years and the misleading, political motivated, manipulative "fact finding" games that they would play. They're less trustworthy than Wikipedia imo.

    [-]
     5 years ago 

    I agree, yes - Wikipedia is dodgy and highly manipulated but Snopes has that intention at it's core.

    $0.00
      Reply