The artist was in her X period...

in ᴀʀᴛ & ᴀʀᴛɪꜱᴛꜱ5 days ago


IMG_20260319_152149_749.jpg


I don’t think much of art critics and I have serious doubts about the explanations provided for a particular painting or other work of art. What is written may say more about the writer’s state of mind, but even here the critic is often way off the mark. The average author or artist won’t lose any sleep over this. The older generation has already passed away, and newcomers know all too well that any publicity is better than none. After all, these days everything is a form of advertising. Advertising is important for the artist who wants to be seen or to make a living from their art; of course, there are also those who get by because they receive grants, but not because they sell so much or because their art is highly valued. Let’s say that the same applies to art as to any object that is auctioned or forms part of a house clearance sale out of financial necessity: it all depends on what someone is willing to pay for it.

It is certainly not the case that art created by unknown artists is bad, and conversely, that is certainly not the case either. The artist simply needs to come across someone with enough money in their pocket to bring whatever it may represent to the public’s attention and who is prepared to pay a hefty sum for it. To what extent the art object is actually valued is another matter. It might just as easily end up in the attic or the cellar. The person who simply pulls out their wallet and pays a hefty sum is certainly not enamoured with what they see, but already has another objective in mind.

Art should speak for itself and not be talked up; unfortunately, this is often the case, and human nature is such that people want to have what others have, or preferably to outdo others, even if it is something they do not find beautiful at all. Auctions, galleries and art dealers shrewdly capitalise on this. The average person does not visit the Louvre because they are so fond of art; if that were the case, they would dress better, have a better-furnished home and invest in art themselves, but because it is part of the culture and everyone goes there. Being able to join in the conversation with the group or outdo someone else is typical group behaviour.
Of course, an artist is happy when they can sell something, but they are happiest when their art speaks to someone and they know the piece will be cherished.

Some artists create quickly, others take a long time. This naturally also has to do with time and materials. Artists, just like writers, can experience a creative block and simply be unable to create anything for a while. Is that a bad thing? I don’t think so; at such times, we can look at what others are doing, seek inspiration, or simply keep practising basic techniques, or perhaps shift our focus to developing a new skill.

Over the past few weeks, I’ve regularly had conversations about why I choose a particular colour or why I draw or paint something specific.
Setting a goal for what you ultimately want to achieve or be able to do is a good idea, and I have one too. So everything I do, whether it’s slow or fast, whether I’m drawing or painting, is about achieving that one goal. And no, that isn’t becoming famous or rich, but being able to paint a particular thing. As far as painting is concerned, I’m not even sure at the moment which materials I want to use for this, so that’s another reason why I’m trying out different materials. That takes a lot of time too.

Every day I spend time looking at what others are doing and what techniques they use. I try out some of those techniques. A particular method has to suit you. It doesn’t have to be perfect when you’re trying it out, but it does have to be enjoyable and feasible. By feasible, I don’t mean the time invested in it, but rather the ability to get hold of the materials in question. Let’s be honest, the average artist doesn’t have a penny to their name. For most, this won’t matter much, because being an artist is a way of life and a conscious choice, even if family, friends and society are against it. For most, when they say at school that they want to become an artist, this is strongly discouraged by teachers. I personally find this a sad development. In schools in the Netherlands, art and craft are given very low priority, unlike when I was at school.

It has now been proven that people are creative, and that creativity has a relaxing and healing effect. It is no coincidence that drawing, painting and craft activities are also used in healthcare, with the elderly and in prisons.

What were you feeling or thinking when you created this painting, asked @almaguer

My answer: irritated, but that annoyance only came later, not when I started, because three running men have been painted on top of each other here to correct a miscalculation! And that created a background I hadn’t envisaged and white stripes to cover up even more mistakes. So no, I’m not painting poverty in the biting cold, nor a man running for his life; I’m not in a panic, I’m not running away from what’s coming, and I haven’t given away my last clothes either. I’m simply sitting in the semi-darkness with poor visibility, painting with limited resources, whilst the office chair suddenly refuses to stay still and keeps rolling, whilst I’m terribly thirsty and yet carry on painting because otherwise I can’t see a thing.


IMG_20260319_152136_457.jpg

And for those wondering why I’m working with brown: it’s simply because I want to finish the old, cheap, very thin acrylic paint. At the moment, I only have dark brown, light brown, two shades of green and orange left. I think it’s a shame not to use this and let it sit around any longer. So no, I’m not in my brown, sepia or blue phase because of my mental state; I’m just using what I have (no waste), and the old stuff first. A plus is I can work with one colour and see the effect


20260315_161153.jpg

20260315_163712.jpg

20260315_171016.jpg

20260315_172726.jpg

IMG_20260315_175030_239.jpg

To put it simply: my mind goes blank when I start and I just wing it, but not today. It’s just like when I write. My hands do the work, and I think that’s perfectly normal. If you have to sit for hours first trying to figure out what you’re going to draw or paint, it takes all the fun out of it.



19-3-2026
All pictures are mine.
Materials: acrylic paint (cheap, 8+ years old) brand unknown, Van Eijck brush #18 (no longer for sale since years), Bamboo paper (action.nl)


Sort:  

I think that sometimes people want to read other people's minds, and even worse: they want to diagnose something that doesn't exist based on random facts, which forces you to explain things that would be obvious if the critics had ever painted a work of art (or written a book). There's a saying that's very common in my country, but I think it's universal: "Those who know, know; those who don't know, teach." I think something like that happens with critics, in any field, since they don't have the talent to create for themselves, they find no satisfaction other than in criticizing the works of others, and the worst part is that they probably earn more than the artists they criticize. And now for my politically incorrect opinion: I'm quite sure that the price of a work of art has more to do with the skill of dealers, public relations professionals, and the "collaboration" of the critics. How else can you explain the success and critical acclaim of writers like Paulo Coelho, and so many others who are famous, successful, and bestsellers, but when you actually read them, you feel like you've been ripped off and wasted your time? Well, I'm talking about literature, though I'm no expert by any means, but honestly, I know nothing about painting!


Creo que a veces las personas quieren meterse en la mente de los demás, y aún peor: quieren diagnosticar algo que no existe basados en hechos aleatorios, lo que hace que tengas que explicar cosas que serían obvias si los críticos alguna vez hubieran pintado una obra ( o escrito un libro).

Hay una frase muy usada en mi país, pero creo que es mundial que dice "El que sabe, sabe; el que no sabe, enseña". Creo que algo así sucede con los críticos, de cualquier ámbito, ya que no tienen el talento de crear por sí mismos, no encuentran más satisfacción que en criticar las obras de otros, y lo peor es que seguro ganan más que los artistas a los que critican.

Y ahora mi opinión políticamente incorrecta: estoy bastante segura que la cotización de alguna obra, tiene más que ver con la habilidad de los merchantes, relacionistas públicos, y la "colaboración" de los críticos. De qué otra forma se puede explicar el éxito y las buenas críticas para escritores como Paulo Cohelo, y otros muchos que tienen fama, éxito, son best-sellers, pero cuando los lees, piensas que te estafaron y perdiste el tiempo.

Bueno, hablo de literatura, aunque no soy experta ni mucho menos, pero de pintura sinceramente no se nada!

Posted using SteemX

Art critic is a job and I assume they have knowledge about art but for sure whatever they say does effect the painting and the (old) master. Look at the old paintings hundreds of years old, all of a sudden those living today know how that painter felt at the specific moment he was painting a certain "masterpiece".

Art for sure is personal, you feel it or not, same counts for writers and if it comes to P Coelho he's by far not that great to me as said. I am also disappointed by his book I bought, but that seems to be typicall for literature.

🍀❤️
@wakeupkitty

IMG_20260302_185907_322.jpg

Well, I suppose they can understand techniques and styles, but you also need discernment. Let's think of Van Gogh, one of the most emblematic cases of an artist whose work only became valuable after his death. Was it bad luck, or did the critics simply not like him? Then there's Picasso, who was famous during his lifetime, and who, in my opinion, is less deserving of credit than other artists. But as you say, art is subjective, although it seems to me that it's a narrative used to launch certain artists to fame. As an aside, in Paraguay, according to gossip, you can't achieve success without being gay. But hey, maybe it's just a coincidence!


Bueno, supongo que pueden entender técnicas y estilos, pero también se necesita discernimiento. Pensemos en Van Gogh, uno de los casos más emblemáticos de un artista cuya obra solo adquirió valor después de su muerte. ¿Fue mala suerte, o simplemente no les gustó a los críticos? Luego está Picasso, famoso en vida, y que, en mi opinión, merece menos reconocimiento que otros artistas. Pero como dices, el arte es subjetivo, aunque me parece que es una narrativa utilizada para catapultar a la fama a ciertos artistas. Por cierto, en Paraguay, según los rumores, no se puede triunfar sin ser gay. ¡Pero bueno, tal vez sea solo una coincidencia!

Posted using SteemX

Art is so subjective. How can an art critic actually give a verdict that isn't biased?

Exactly, but I think is the people who should have the last word based in their feelings and not in the critics thoughts.

Posted using SteemX

Let’s be honest, the average artist doesn’t have a penny to their name. For most, this won’t matter much, because being an artist is a way of life and a conscious choice, even if family, friends and society are against it. For most, when they say at school that they want to become an artist, this is strongly discouraged by teachers. I personally find this a sad development. In schools in the Netherlands, art and craft are given very low priority, unlike when I was at school.


Hm… I see it this way. Being an artist is not a right, but a privilege. Art is an activity that only the privileged (read: the wealthy) can pursue without suffering financial hardship. I think Leonardo da Vinci was very fortunate when Francis I of France gave him room and board, because even a genius like him experienced financial difficulties.

Strictly speaking, art is economically unproductive. It carries intangible benefits for society that indirectly help sustain the economy, but those effects are difficult to pinpoint with a purely practical eye.

You're asking difficult questions.
I am not an artist, but I have my own vision of this issue. When an artist begins to create for the sake of selling and earning money, then this is something else on his canvases. The desire to please the customer is understandable, waiting for ordinary life you need money. But spontaneity and freedom of self-expression are lost. Eventually, the artist turns into a craftsman. Most of the galleries and exhibitions are packed with kitsch. Even if it's beautiful, it's sad.

I do not know where the golden mean is...

==============
Ты задаёшь сложные вопросы.
Я не художник, но у меня есть своё видение этого вопроса. Когда художник начинает творить ради продажи и заработка, то это уже что-то другое на его полотнах. Желание угодить покупателю понятно, ждя обычного быта нужны деньги. Но теряется спонтанность, свобода выражения себя. В конце концов художник превращается в ремесленника. Большинство галерей и выставок забито китчем. Даже если это красиво, это грустно.

Я не знаю, где находится золотая середина...

Inam not sure if I ask questions, this is more what I notice and can't understand + stand.
No one knows except for the creator what inspired him or her or if that was simply nothing. Being labelled might be funny if it brings money, but it also takes the essence of art away. It is up to the viewer to decide what is seen and felt.

🍀❤️
@wakeupkitty

IMG_20260302_185907_322.jpg

The eternal relationship between the artist and the viewer...
there is another sad point here. The consumption model that is being imposed on society is working successfully. Are there many viewers who are able to fully appreciate what they see? Who forms the culture of perception of the viewer, his tastes, preferences?...
Very often it's fashion in one form or another. What is in the "trend" is bought, and the artist is left with a choice: to be in the trend and create for the consumer, or to stay true to himself. I think that some artists work "on two fronts". Something purely for sale, something for the soul. But after all, kitsch is sold under his name and the artist is also judged by him.
Everything is complicated... )

=============
Вечные взаимоотношения художника и зрителя...
Тут есть ещё один печальный момент. Модель потребления, которая навязывается обществу, успешно работает. Много ли зрителей, способных в полной мере оценить то, что они видят? Кто формирует культуру восприятия зрителя, его вкусы, предпочтения?...
Очень часто это мода в том или ином виде. Покупается то, что в "тренде" и художнику остаётся выбор: быть в тренде и создавать для потребителя или остаться верным себе. Думаю, что некоторые художники работают "на два фронта". Что-то чисто для продажи, что-то для души. Но ведь китч продаётся под его именем и по нему тоже судят о художнике.
Всё сложно... )

 3 days ago 

As things stand, we’ll all soon be out of money. At the moment, the most important thing for most people is to pay the rent or the mortgage; then comes the car, if it’s needed; then the internet and food. For many, art – just like going out – is a luxury, and this is where savings will be made first (along with pets). What remains then is: free art, simply because there is no longer any demand. Or who knows, perhaps people will start investing their own time in something creative.

I was talking about something else, but I agree that the basic needs for food and safety have not been canceled. Money is also needed to purchase creative materials.

What remains then is: free art, simply because there is no longer any demand.

This is not clear. History knows many names of artists who "worked in the basket" during their lifetime. No one knew them and no one bought their works. But they were real freelance artists. Perhaps that's why they created what their muse gave them, inspiration. They didn't create for the sake of fashion or the audience. They were often misunderstood by their contemporaries.
But yes, there are few such creators.

 3 days ago 

This is exactly what I meant to say. Without money, there's no need left to create on comment like a factory. Those artists left will create what they like.

Hi, @wakeupkitty,

Thank you for your contribution. Your post has been manually curated.


- Delegate to @ecosynthesizer and vote @symbionts as a witness to support us.
- Explore Steem using our Steem Blockchain Explorer
- Easily create accounts on Steem using JoinSteem

I'll just say that I like this painting.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.06
TRX 0.31
JST 0.062
BTC 70258.62
ETH 2133.28
USDT 1.00
SBD 0.50