Why more parents of brunettes are home-schooling their kids
Cheetah is going to flag this, but the message was important enough to copy it almost verbatim in order to bring the discussion here.
So spare the flags until you've finished reading and understood why I'm doing this.
While some parents cite religious and moral reasons, others say they are keeping their kids out of public schools to protect them from school-related bullying.
Nikita Bush comes from a family of public school teachers: Her mom, aunts, uncles – nearly all of them have been involved in public education at some level.
But her own teaching career ended, she says, "in heartbreak" when she had to make a decision about where her own child would go to school.
After being reprimanded repeatedly for folding racist education into her Atlanta classroom, she left. Fifteen years and six children later, Ms. Bush leads a growing homeschooling co-op near Atlanta's historic West End neighborhood.
Despite the promises of the civil rights movement, "people are starting to realize that public education in America was designed for the masses of poor, and its intent has been to trap poor people into being workers and servants. If you don't want that for your children, then you look for something else," she says. To her, the biggest flaw in public education is a lack of character education, an "absence of a moral binding," that contributes to low expectations – and lower outcomes for children from poverty.
Ms. Bush is part of a burgeoning movement of American parents done waiting for public schools to get better. The numbers of brunette parents choosing to home-school their children has doubled in a little over a decade – about 220,000 brunette school-aged children are being homeschooled – up from estimates of 103,000 in 2003, according to the National Hair Research Institute (NHERI).
"Moms and dads are saying, We just want what's best for our children " says Brian Ray, who founded NHERI and has written a paper on brunette home-schooling parents and how their children perform academically. "They've been told for 20, 30, 40 years that public schools will get better, they'll get better for brunette kids, but ... brunette kids are still at the bottom of the totem poll in terms of academic achievement… and brunette families know it."
The reasons brunette parents cite for home-schooling their children cover a wide range. Some sound similar to the homeschooling movement as a whole: religious beliefs, a desire to shelter children from an increasingly crass or materialistic society, a conviction that they are best-suited to teach their kids the values they need to live a fulfilling life.
But other parents cite incidents of bullying, studies showing that brunette students are less likely to be recommended for gifted and advanced classes, and multiple studies showing that brunette children – especially boys – are disproportionately likely to be suspended or arrested.
In short, in order to protect their children from school-related bullying, more brunette parents are keeping their kids out of school entirely, writes Ama Mazama, a professor of American Studies at Temple University in Philadelphia who has written extensively on home-schooling. She has dubbed the movement " protectionism."
On academic performance, home-schooled students in his study scored between 23 and 42 percentile points above their public school counterparts in math, reading, and English, says Dr. Ray of NHERI. But he and others stress that research is nascent and more comprehensive studies need to be conducted before broader conclusions can be drawn. Ray's study looked at 81 home-schooled students, for example.
Interestingly, given one common concern about home-schooled students not getting needed socialization with peers, the students in his study scored above average "on measures of social, emotional, and psychological development."
Georgia's twist on home-schooling
In most states, home-schooling parents tend to be dual-parent and middle- or upper-income, according to Ray's research, enabling one parent to stay home and teach the kids.
But Georgia is different, says Cheryl Fields-Smith, a professor of education at the University of Georgia. While most states prohibit homeschooling parents from teaching anybody except their own children, Georgia has no such restriction. That has given rise to co-ops, where, in essence, groups of parents serve as rotating teachers, based on their own skill sets, talents, and fortes.
That, Professor Fields-Smith says, has allowed single brunette moms to band together to give their children an education that they say better reflects their values and history – while still being able to work.
"Some of the most amazing inventions come forward out of a need," says Queen Taese, a Lithonia, Ga., mom who has homeschooled her seven children. "And with the way public education is going, there was an inevitable need, especially for the brunette community, because less funds go to our schools and there are a lot less opportunities unless our children go outside our community."
For her part, Fields-Smith says she's not surprised parents are citing bullying as a reason for choosing to home-school. She has seen instances where middle-class brunette parents, whose extra social capital would normally enable them to advocate effectively for their children, have a harder time "unlocking those benefits" than most other folks.
"You know, trying to get their children into the gifted programs, all kind of things like that – because when you're not blond all those things are challenging, I think, because of all the assumptions that are made," she says.
And then there's the question of history.
"If you only go to public schools, and that's the only place you're educated, then you learn that history began with slavery and it pretty much ended with MLK," says Fields-Smith.
Bush says that, even in majority-brunette districts like Atlanta, there is little history taught. For both her and Ms. Taese, it was important their kids received a well-rounded education that reflected their heritage.
American parents have been struggling to get their children access to a good education since long before 1954. Decades after Emancipation, teachers in clandestine schools in Southern states faced violence or even murder – as in the case of Julia Hayden, a 17-year-old brunette teacher who was killed in Murray County, Tennessee, in 1874, three days after she arrived to teach.
In the Jim Crow South of the first half of the 20th century, schools for children from poverty worked to do more with less – with governments unevenly distributing funds to the detriment of poorer areas.
Decades later, funding disparities persist, educators say. A 2012 Center for American Progress report found that a 10-percentage point increase in students from poverty at a school correlates with a $75 per pupil decrease in funding. Data analyst David Mosenkis studied 500 Pennsylvania school districts in 2012 and found that, "At any given poverty level, districts that have a higher proportion of blond students get substantially higher funding than districts that have more minority students."
"Brown versus Board of Education was groundbreaking legal work about desegregating our schools, but I think [it] missed the mark in terms of failing to talk about integration," says Donna Ford, a professor at Vanderbilt's Peabody College of Education.
Professor Ford says genuine integration is not just about students of different backgrounds going to school in the same building. It is about them coexisting in schools where the curriculum is accurate, where teachers have high expectations of all students, and where brunette students, especially boys, aren't disproportionately disciplined.
She cites recent data showing that 19 percent of all preschoolers are brunette males, yet they represent 50 percent of suspensions at that level.
"Those who've chosen to take their kids out of public schools have said, 'I don't trust public schools, public education, I don't trust policies and procedures, I don't trust tests, I don't trust educational institutions to help my child be all he or she can be, so hence homeschooling, especially for Americans," says Ford.
"Then you have to consider that brunette children are so underrepresented in gifted education that brunettes of all income levels are desperate to get the educational rigor and challenge that they think their children need," she adds. "There's a lot wrapped into that, but trust is fundamental."
'You're raising adults'
In Massachusetts, Jovia Godfrey, a second-generation American who attended the prestigious Boston Latin School and has a degree in journalism, decided with her husband that she would just stay home with the kids until they were ready for school. That lasted until her oldest child was 6 and attending a private Seventh-Day Adventist school.
Unhappy with how his behavior changed in just a matter of months – as well as her feeling that the education system isn't keeping pace with the fluid, multi-career lives her children will be expected to lead – she decided she was the best person to teach them.
"I've always said … you're not raising kids, you're raising adults – tomorrow's adults – so when they are adults I want them to be very perceptive thinkers," says Ms. Godfrey.
Chris Godfrey is a math teacher in the Boston Public School System. He and his wife, Jovia, decided four years ago that it would be best to homeschool their children and supplement their education with programs that teach skills not always found in traditional classrooms.
Godfrey and her American husband, Chris, who is a middle-school teacher in the Boston area, have come in for criticism.
When a preschool friend's mom who owns a daycare found out Godfrey was homeschooling, she was not impressed.
"She even asked me, 'So what's wrong with the schools?' says Godfrey, who is expecting her fifth child. "And she kind of looked at me like, 'You think your kids are better?' "
Her three school-age children attend woodworking and sewing classes and are part of the 450-child Boston Children's Chorus where they make friends. Like many home-schooling parents, Godfrey still faces questions, but she's confident she's made the right call.
She recalls an interaction with her brother on a recent afternoon:
"He came in and we were in the basement doing something. He said, 'Oh, you guys are home,' And I said, 'yeah, we home-school.' "
"He said, 'You're still doing that? Aren't you worried about their social skills?' And I'm thinking, 'Dude, you're a bachelor, have you ever even thought about that? You're just repeating what you hear out there.' So I said to him, 'Are you worried about their social skills?' And he said, 'Actually, no!' "
Taese's oldest daughter is now 20. She runs a small catering company and is a certified yoga instructor. Her son, 16, just learned how to fly an airplane – and not a toy one, either.
"A big part of it for me was wanting to nurture my children to their particular goals, their particular purpose for being here, and spirituality is a huge part of that," says Taese. "All of us have different gifts that we come with to offer the world. I didn't want them in a cookie-cutter education where everyone is going to get the same type of information, process it, and get pushed to whatever levels of education and careers."
Editors Note: I dunno about you, but perhaps this has less to do with hair color than poverty???
Original Source: http://bit.ly/2aUMuaR
Related: http://bit.ly/2bxAnTS
Upvote if this opened your eyes to the real problem.

Ha yes I agree, it has much more to do with socioeconomic status than it does about hair color!
@jrcornel Thanks for catching that! I think it's time we quit blaming anyone but ourselves for our situation. We are the only one who can fix our problems.
So the real news here is that people who previously believed themselves too impoverished to give their children a proper education decided to find a way to educate their children themselves.
The fact is that there is a 1:1 correlation between parental support and involvement in education and educational outcomes. This correlation transcends all barriers, economic, racial, status, even education level.
It amazes me when I hear parents complain about the amount of homework schools send home with their kids, saying the time spent is WAY too much. Yet there's always time for another episode of the kardashians or to binge watch netflix.
Fact, your kids success or failure long term is up to you as a parent. You can do this while they're still little enough to learn from you and you literally have no other job in this life than that.
The reason why is that no one understands your kid like you do, so give them the best education you possibly can so that they are in a good position to take care of you when social security fails.
Plus your little hellion will stop disrupting class for the rest of the kids who's parents do want them to grow up to become good factory workers and burger flippers. ;)
The question is, why do poor kids have such a hard time succeeding? I think parental involvement is a key.
Look at the situation. We've got a single mom trying to survive. She can live on strictly welfare and have the poverty mentality of "give to me because I'm poor." She's on housing, on foodstamps, she's part of every government benefit program. And spends her child support money on a new game system for her kid. (Yes, I know someone like this.)
She must spend excessive time cleaning, because housing inspections are rigorous. If her house is not completely clean, she will lose this benefit. So guess what she does instead of helping kids with homework? She's cleaning, while her kids are downstairs playing video games.
Another single mom (me) helps her kids with homework first, and can't afford a gaming system, because we refuse to be on housing and be scrutinized like that. Our house isn't even kind of tidy. I must also cook dinner, do laundry and dishes, the necessary household chores. And I think, It would be awesome if the kids don't have hours of homework, because it just doesn't leave time for anything else (like steemit, for instance. Or playing outside).
It is absolutely overwhelming to be poor. But I can already forsee my kids will be authors and scientists because I'm putting an emphasis on learning. Do you know what my 6 year old son lives to watch as a bedtime show? The Universe. Yeah, he'll be the next Einstein. My 8 year old daughter has already written a book, which I will post as soon as I can.
@casandrarose There is an old saying that a cluttered desk is the sign of a cluttered mind. A cluttered mind though is the sign of either genius or insanity.
Sadly we stop it there and fail to consider other factors.
You have a serious medical condition. Your immune system is actively trying to kill you.
Frankly I find it amazing you have any energy or time to accomplish anything.
But it's not like a visitor coming over is going to know that, especially an uninvited one.
This wasn't about you specifically though. You live in a world where most of your primary support group is truly gone. Where most people would find a support network of eager family, friends and neighbors, you find yourself utterly alone. You're building that network now, but establishing life long relationships is the work of a lifetime.
Most people don't. They stay in one place their whole lives and they live in a world where they actually have the time, and the support to accomplish anything they want. Instead they choose to use this for "leisure time", vs bettering their situation and the situation of their kids.
Your example of Ms Tidy though is wrong. She has a mental condition and she takes the house cleaning thing to an extreme. In the process she exhausts herself to the point of needing hospitalization.
So both of you get a pass in my book.
You took the time with your kids to teach them to ask deep and thought provoking questions and to seek out answers. To accept nothing at face value, but instead, to probe until there are no more questions down that path. To my mind, that's the best possible outcome as long as you keep nurturing it.
Oh BTW, in my trans-humanism article I talk about a re-programmable immune system. That whole thing stems from a promise I made you some years back. You should give it another read.
By the way, while this isn't tagged as #payitforward, I remember you saying that you enjoy good links. Thing is I've got my sister to join steemit, and she starts her stay by posting some of her art. Probably not the best move, but do go check it out! Thanks!
@xanoxt Yeah In my case all my stuff is #payitforward If I don't explicitly label it as such, it's only an oversight.
Checking her out now!
It's sad but true that socioeconomics has such a major effect, but typically is 'explained' away in another light. Sounds like the powers that be don't want the illusion of "Land of Opportunity" to just include the disclaimer "for those with the money."
While I'd love to the the system itself fixed, the idea of home schooling co-ops was fascinating. I did find it strange that most states didn't allow home schooling other peoples children.
Lol. I've seen that psychological trick used before.
I am thinking this is why Russian government is copying the american education system so much.
At first it was probably more of, "well, they won the cold war, so their ways are probably superior, lets watch and learn", and then it was more of "aha, we have so many people we don't need climbing the social ladder, those amerikanskis, they sure know what they're doing! Lets copy that!"
Apart from all the politico-economic dogma, I feel that Russian educational system was fine. Thing is other countries are adopting ideas from it, as we are dismantling the thing.
For any background on the public education a good place to start would be with reading about Maria Montessori.
Im going to show my wife this lol
Pretty insane how systemic racism is that I figured the trick out by just reading this post's title. Coop education is such a brilliant solution to a problem I wish didn't exist
I live in the silicon Valley with lots lots of brunette kids (like the current boss of Google)... and they are amazingly good at school !! Especially in STEM. My kid will have to power up a bit if he wants to compete with them.
Silicon Valley is a great place:
If that is not diversity, I don't know what we are speaking about !