You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: if( piss() && vinegar() ) { flag(@berniesanders) }
As most users abide by the code-is-law philosophy via their behavior, I think that it is very unlikely that people will ban together against Mr. Sanders. Although many think he is harmful to the platform, his existence and behavior provide an interesting criticism of the whole Proof-of-Brain idea.
Steem is the best place to break away from that code-is-law attitude in my opinion. This is a good place to script applications that are based on trust and consensus without hard-enforcing the behavior. We can't hard code opinion.
Also, if code is law then flagging is a big part of the law here. The whales know this quite well, as many of them engage in terrorist-like behavior when they start getting called out, and we let them get away with it every time.
The only joint venture flagging effort is Steem Flag Rewards. Ironically, that group is backed by the person in question and they stay away from flagging large accounts which is the reason I won't join them. The fact that 2 major backers of SFR engaged in a flag war against each other further convinced me that things are not what they appear to be. Thank you for your time.
exactly, large accounts are the only ones that need to be regulated.