A decade from now, bitcoin is more likely to be $100 than $100,000
Wow, a true enemy of BTC. First he lies: "it's actual uses as a transaction vehicle are very small"; then claims it's only for money laundering; and culminates with a call for global regulation.
But it's to be liberated from dishonest or clueless elitists like him that alternative currencies outside of state control are being created. And they will eventually win because they are better.
It's interesting to think that centralized control over currencies is a battle most states will probably give up on within the century.
Check out this Article for more detail :
the thing is that ...the only decentralized coin that exist today is Bitcoin.
All the other are shit coins - remember what happened last year when someone said that Vitalik B is dead and ETH lost 50% over night
https://qz.com/1014559/vitalik-buterin-dead-a-hoax-on-4chan-crashed-ethereums-price/
Few hours later everyone knew it was fake news
And ETH is the second coin after BTC
imagine what would have happen is it was a smaller coin or if it was true.
Bitcoin will not loose its value because there is no one controlling it.
Thanks for this worth a follow. I enjoyed it, Keep up the good work.
thanks for apprication :)
I would disagree because there is a limited number of bitcoins. So if bitcoin is going to stay it is likely to stay above $ 10 k, or it will crack down and hit bottom much lower than $100.
Bitcoin for our life will not reach $ 100 again, because it already has more sentimental value for many people ...
Oh look another 'BTC is used mostly for money laundering' commentator. So sick of these people.