You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Elimination of Curation Rewards
I agree with this because it would eliminate the voting on posts that people don't actually read. We want to have this site be a reflection of what people want to engage with. We don't currently have that. The sooner we have a valuable site, the sooner more will flock here. No one is attracted to a place where no one reads the posts. That's absurd.
Thats like agreeing to castration because he peed on the toilet seat.
It's more like halting rewards for those who are paid to piss on the toilet seat :)
Castration would be removing someone's ability to vote.
Analogy fight! :)
well played
I think you are really mischaracterizing. There really is demonstrable evidence that people are voting on posts without reading them, and the main thing that is incentivizing this is curation rewards.
no, it's not.