You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: {blog} A Criticism Of Harmonic Mixing
Geez I am not even a DJ and this entire concept still pissed me off. The truly great moments across all genres of music are when the expectations of the brain are teased and tickled, with one thing set up and then another thing coming, and it is these moments that cause the brain to light up like a circuit board and fire on all cylinders as it catches up to what is going on and rejoices in the unexpected (but perfect) change in melody, or timing, or whatever. Great post!
You know what, I don't have a problem with the actual philosophy of it. It was the sheer volume of people saying "oh yeah, harmonic is a 4 or 5 for me". I wonder if they were getting "harmonic" mixed up with "in tune", because they have vastly different implications!
The idea that you could be omitting something like 90% of your collection when going from one track to another is just madness to me. I wish I'd used this phrase in the text now but it is like a DJ set's version of The Loudness War.
We erect so many mental barriers - I can't play this genre and that genre, I can't play music by this artist or from that label. Got to tear those down sometimes.
Well the funny thing to me is though that it is such a limited philosophy even if you were going to base song selection on music theory. Simply moving around a half step in either direction or switching from major to minor is ignoring all the other ways chords and keys relate to each other. At the very least, where is the switch to the dominant or sub-dominant key (the 5th or 4th note from the root note, respectively), which would right there introduce WAY more complexity to such a scheme? And which of course is very pleasing to the ear.