While this post certainly showed a great deal of passion, I was sad to see that much of it was negative. At Utopian, we are about promoting open source projects, and in a post that's meant to elevate one project, you seem to have spent most of your time attacking a different open source project - one of the most successful open source projects ever, in fact.

Your post mentions wikipedia more times than it does hede.io, which I found to be telling. Comparisons with other projects are always welcome, but the focus of the post should the project you're writing about. The post could have used far more detailed information about hede.io, and would have benefited from graphics illustrating your points about hede.io, rather than your issues with wikipedia.

In addition, we require posts in the Utopian blog category to include a link to the project's repository.

I think you're a good writer, and I'd like to see more contributions from you on the Utopian blog category. But I would hope that future posts are more positive, and more in line with our guidelines.

Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.

To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.

Need help? Write a ticket on https://support.utopian.io/.
Chat with us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]