assumed facts not in evidence

This seems a little odd because a selling point early on for NLM was that it only (read: largely—it still needs some common sense context that it gets from training data) pulls from sources you provide.

That doesn't altogether prevent it from hallucinating. I've seen some doozies in my experimentation! But it should stick relatively to the context at hand via sources you've uploaded.

I wonder if they've relaxed that a bit to make a more viable product overall.

They extended the number of sources you can add from 50 to 100, but even with that, I often wish I could add more sources just for context to point it in the right direction.