You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Designing for the middle means losing your best and your brightest [burnsteem100]
Great to see the results of your experimentation!
Generating a "Deep Dive" audio episode is a new favorite way to learn for me.
I haven't started using it, but they've integrated NLM into Gemini now so you can reference your notebook in your chat interface. "Generate a cover image for the article about how focusing on middles leads to losing the best."
I can definitely understand that, although based on my other comment, "assumes facts not in evidence", it could steer you wrong if you don't compare against the source documents. Maybe that tendency is reduced as you add additional sources, though.
I think it's also helpful to shape a general understanding if you acknowledge that details might be off. To my understanding, general orientation is an excellent use case for LLMs. They are mathematically locked in to a source-specific semantic space.
So, if you're looking for a general overview and understanding to get oriented in a space, it works well. If you're looking for research grade details to support a particular thesis, look elsewhere! (For now; classical programming can be used for complementary tools to guide the LLM in the background, and I think that's starting to become a standard environment set-up).