You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: STEEMIE IS DEAD - WHAT WE LEARNED AND WHAT WE ARE DOING MOVING FORWARD
I'm particularly touched by this chick's story. We've had birds in our house for as far as I can remember, even grew chicks in the backyard. Many have died over the years, so it's an emotional experience for me when I see birds die 😢
Some of us just are overly empathetic to the point where it can cripple us with sadness and you have to just block it out sometimes, also remember The souls easily reincarnate into newborn chicks, YOLo is a lie, you dont only live once, biological life is just like a machine the spirit is eternal (but is also physical and can be acptured into copper tubes, its scarey but nothing is really immortal, you can have your soul captured like Ghost Busters, and stored as energy, and you cant do much to stop an advanced being with beter tech than you from doing this to you if they wanted! Scarey but try not to think abouyt it!
I'm not too saddened though, I rejoice because life goes on, and more happy healthy chicks will hatch eventually 🐣🐥🐤🐔
yes and they are just velociraptors! they have livd on this planet for tens of millions of years
chickens are super ancient! i guss we all are lol its silly to call one animal a living fossil as if its more ancent than anything else
what is intresting is to think if your parents take longer top have you, could some people be moe evolved than others? Like hear me out:
some people have kids earlir, and so lets say one generation in oene village waits untill theyre in their 30s every generation to have kids, the other village has kids when they turn 15, so after 100 years, one village is already twice as evolved! over thousands or tens of thousands of years, certain peopel end up having kids faster, some sloewer, so wont some peopel end up more evolved than others? or does it average out?
Like if some family just has a tradition of having kids at an earlier age, like right at puberty, to create as much genetic diversity as fast as possible, wont that allow that family to not only grow faster but adapter quicker? or has human civilization stopped natural selkection??? I dount it, i think women still choose the striongest men or what they perceive as the striongest high status men, and the dominance hierrhcy is a tool for natural selection etc, so i thnk were still evolving somehow, to adapt to our industrial world for sure!