Sort:  

I get it. I really do. Yet I also know that simply saying that and advocating for anarchy is not realistic. The population has been so indoctrinated, so dumbed down, and so willing to not be responsible for their own actions that they could not handle such a change.

A lot of death could happen, a lot of violence, and likely in their insanity they'd actually kill off most of the people that actually GET it.

I do see escaping the idea of FORCE as the ultimate goal. Yet I think educating and waking people up to self responsibility, and critical thinking must happen before that is a realistic goal.

In other words, it is not likely to happen quickly, or even in our generation.

We can still strive towards that though. For me it is walking a path towards that and I try to take steps towards it rather than pretending I can teleport there. I am not saying you are doing this. I am merely speaking about why I don't continually talk about anarchy. I have in the past. I don't see it as actually moving people towards being able to do that. Yet it likely does move some people. We need to try a lot of different approaches to wake people up.

So while I get it. That is why you don't see me joining the bandwagon of talking about anarchy.

Though I do talk about it sometimes. I consider my ultimate leanings if things were to go towards what I think would work best as either an anarcho-capitalist, or a minarchist.

What is coming will separate the cans from the can'ts.
Many people will find that they can, if they really want.
Those who think they can't change the world, won't.

You do a good job.
Reading this post triggered my little drummer bird, and out popped a seed.
Let's hope it reaches fertile ground.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.29
TRX 0.12
JST 0.033
BTC 70272.86
ETH 3773.70
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.82