RE: Red Alert! The Red Flag Bill No One Is Talking About!
So instead of offering a few, since there are so many and explaining Why and How it is so, you want me to Trust your word?
The one that sticks out most is the upper and lowercase nonsense, as well as the idea of secret accounts in our names by the federal govt. Also what stood out was the denial that a state has [criminal] jurisdiction over a person through their statutes. It reeks of the strawperson fringe of the movement warped by bizarre delusions.
Especially when you cannot conclusively demonstrate any of these baseless assertions.
What also stood out sounded like the classic lien fraud committed by sovereign citizens also known as paper terrorism.
Which offers no explanation as to why and how it is so.
As far as not knowing that the legislature represents the people, is something a reasonable disenfranchised person may argue. But it is still a shared belief with the sovereign citizens. The distinction between an ordinary person is that it is more likely to be a simple belief or spur of the moment rhetoric, whereas a sovereign citizen would more likely hold onto the belief at a delusional level.
The legislature applies to no Sovereign. The jurisdiction of a Commercial Code is over commerce. The US is no more federal and no more National, it's foreign to the American States.
You asked for examples that the document reference stuff from the sovereign citizens playbook, and i provided them. Your disagreement of law is irrelevant to what you had requested.
Article 3 of the constitution, section 2.
Article 1, section 7
The legislature, who represents the people, has the ability to pass bills, the executive branch (the sovereign) can then sign them into law. Once they are [federal] law [or equity issued from a federal court], the judiciary branch then has jurisdiction for those who violate the law.
Just because you say that the you in capital letters is a corporation, not a person, doesn't make it so nor does it deny the courts of their jurisdiction over a person or a corporation. Even the UCC capitalization provision doesn't legitimize a corportaion, the optional capital letters provisions applies to warrentees-and capital letters alone will not save a warrantee. And even if you were a corporation, the federal courts still has jurisdiction where the united states is a party or other provision of article 3 in a federal or civil claim against a person or corporation. That means that the federal courts has jurisdiction over a person, regardless if they hide behind the shell of a corporation, when there is probable cause to believe they have violated federal law. They will nail, oh will they nail, a person whose only defense appears to be that he is a rogue person of his own corporation.
How and why does it represent the people?
the executive branch (the sovereign)
How and why is the executive the Sovereign? Simply saying it's so doesn't make it so.
Who do they have jurisdiction over? How?
Keep asserting its so because it doesn't require anything more than your baseless assertions.
It seems you're not denying that corporations were created after you and are what the court has jurisdiction over, but you claim that it doesn't matter, because that's not fraudulent as fuck if someone creates corporations after your given name and rolls them into giant trusts after they had been used as sureties for the debts of the bankrupt United States Of America. The crime of Personage and Barratry.
#4 http://annavonreitz.com/howtousetheglossa.pdf