International Space Station is being privately owned

Before America, after the aerospace. It is normal for Donald Trump to do this in America. Maybe that's probably happening. After 204, the Trump Administration wants to reduce the allocation for ISS (International Space Station). The administration wants to send the ISS laboratory under the supervision of a non-government organization.

Quoting a NASA internal document, the Washington Post said, "In 2025, the direct funding of the Federal Fund on the ISS does not mean that the platform itself will be discontinued. It may be that the operation of the ISS from the commercial platform. NASA will increase international and commercial partnerships in the next seven years to keep the space station in orbit and to ensure its presence.
The White House has proposed a $ 150 million allocation for the coming fiscal year, through which the ISS will be prepared for future non-privatization. For several weeks there was a buzz about the Trump administration's plan. The possibility of raising such a proposal from the White House has further enhanced this buzz. The federal government spent around $ 400 million on the ISS laboratory. It is being planned to reduce this expenditure.
The ISS was launched jointly with the world-wide space agency 20 years ago. This space station, under the supervision of NASA, circled around the world. The lifespan of the launch was completed in 2028. In this situation the concerned officials are skeptical about whether the space station will survive this time even after the scheduled time. There is also the high cost of the case. In this situation, the station is planning to leave the private sector.
Meanwhile, Boeing has repeatedly warned about NASA's arrangement of 462.5 tonnes of Bharata, which could have major negative effects if this important space station is left in the private sector. The White House has taken into consideration. For this, the White House has asked for market analysis and business plans from the commercial organizations. However, there was no response from the White House on the whole plan related to this issue.
Retired astronaut Mark Kelly sees the issue in a mixed view. In a commentary published in The New York Times, he wrote, "Commercial activity in space could be positive. Boeing and Space X But reducing the federal funds for the space agency will put an end to the overall program. It will not be good for the country. '