Unlearn to Learn How to Handle Freedom and Anarchy

in #philosophy6 years ago (edited)

Conditioning is strong. Expecting people to change and function a different way when they are conditioned into a certain way of living is not going to happen without new information. What they previously learned might be wrong, and they need to unlearn in order to relearn again. Without teaching or sharing information to help others "unlearn what they have learned", as Yoda says, then change isn't likely going to happen.


Source: public domain, flickr

Giving people complete freedom is ideal, but we don't live that way yet. Without the knowledge and responsibility developed to understand how to live free, our behavior doesn't produce successful outcomes in the short term. We can learn from failures and eventually "get it right". Chaos is a teacher. But that takes time and willingness to want to learn, unlearn, and relearn how to do better.

Maybe after many generations people would figure out how to live in freedom, responsibility, with rules and moral law, "organically" without actively trying to figure it out. But just sticking people into a new environment that they don't understand, and expecting them to quickly learn how to do things properly, is unrealistic. They are conditioned with another way of living. Truth takes time, and unconditioning ourselves takes time as well.

Children need to be raised into awareness to become free thinkers and responsible in life. We don't just drop a newborn or growing child and kick them out to go live their own life. They need to be raised. Those who have knowledge, and understand things, can teach those who don't so that everyone can have the same understanding. We can help raise consciousness of others so that they can live within the boundaries of freedom within moral law.

An true moral anarchistic model can only succeed if people create within the philosophy of that model, which can't be done right now since many people don't even understand what anarchy is: freedom, responsibility, law, truth.

You can't create something you don't know how to create. The world at large doesn't understand anarchy much, but many on Steemit do. We have can make this place work better as a model for how to live in the real world, if we want. But it's a long, tedious, tiresome process to learn and arrive at a common grounded basis of understanding together.

Humanity has a long history of mistakes. We need to learn from the past in order to not repeat the same mistakes into the future. Ignoring all the trials and tribulations of the people in the past, who have taught us lessons not to repeat, is rather foolish. Setting kids up in a new area with no rules, and having them try to figure things out, isn't going to get to a true moral anarchistic way of living. That's starting all over, not building and standing on the shoulders of those who came before us. Lord of the Flies is an example of how well that works out.

One way is of reinventing the wheel, to have people learn in a causal relationship with reality over and over, starting from zero for each person, to not teach the successive generations and keep learning, which can take years, or never happen get the optimal result desired. Or we can instead actively teach about a way of living so that people understand how to live that way. Then that way of living can be created in the aggregate collective society. Learning comes first, then action that changes.

Until such a time that everyone gets taught moral law when they are raised as young ones, rules of conduct need to be established by those who have the moral knowledge to direct the education of a community. This is what humanity has been doing, but getting lost, and taking a long long time to make improvements. But, we are working towards more moral ways of living, although slowly, over centuries, going back and forth on certain things. If we had more of a drive to be moral, a care for moral truth, we could get things changed within a generation.

Anarchy will happen in society, once people learn how to live in an anarchistic way. This can be done through trials and tribulations of each person learning for themselves, or through an effort to learn and educate ourselves and each other, without making all the mistakes over and over and learning the hard way.


Thank you for your time and attention. Peace.


If you appreciate and value the content, please consider: Upvoting, Sharing or Reblogging below.
Follow me for more content to come!


My goal is to share knowledge, truth and moral understanding in order to help change the world for the better. If you appreciate and value what I do, please consider supporting me as a Steem Witness by voting for me at the bottom of the Witness page.

Sort:  

Indeed @krnel, a good mindset to follow. Though you being as an example for the free thinking people, i want to ask you: How do you get people to start listening at least to this way of action and thinking? Many many people are so deep-rooted/brainwashed into traditional, fear/emotion, religion, nationalism ect type of thinking that nothing you could ever say (logical and palpable arguments) could make them see the truth; they're so reliant on God, the system, money, consumerism that they just defend it with all they got and if they don't know how to logically or reasonably present arguments that their world is the right way then they come with: ''Oh i know that God is there and will take care of everything; belief is what gives me strength and i don't need any other logical arguments to know He's there'' type of thing. How do you cope with this people/sheep ?

People need to care for truth, to care about what is happening, to want to know, to not want to be fooled... but that takes a catalyst to shock ppl out of their slumber and awaken to realize they dont know whats going on and want to know in order to better their lives. That's how I see it. Put out the info and see who gets affected by it, who wants to learn. Trying to get ppl to learn something they don't want to does't really work. Can't force a horse to drink, or make someone walk through a door... etc.

Yeah i see, and indeed other ways should prevail to guide them; although im thinking if so many out there are not willing to learn, then the change would rather take so much longer if we are up to wait for them for the lightbulb to light up if you know what i mean. Sometimes they may need a trigger or an impulse in order to set the wheels in motion. Just like a battery of a car.

Sorry for the late reply, didn't had access to the internet. Hope you're doing alright.

The idea of morality has become so obscured that my own mother could not even give me an accurate definition. The law has over complicated things, the Truth is so basic a seven year old could understand it.

What is right vs. wrong?

Right action is anything that is a right. What is a right? Any action which does not harm another or their property.

What is wrong? Any action that is not a right.

This applies to any person or group of persons, such as police, government and military.

If you are committing harm that is not your right, regardless of your title.

The reason people can not come to terms with this is because they still believe in false authority that commits acts which are not rights and tells them only they have those rights. This in turn has to be accepted else those same authority figures be wrong and illegitimate. People blur the lines of morality to believe a lie, leading to moral relativism - believing people decide what is right or wrong.

Yup, pretty simple. But ppl want someone else to deal with those who violate that principle... so they want centralized external control when others fail to exercise self-control.

While voluntarism is ideal, I wonder at its feasibility. From recorded history, to small groups locally one interacts with, groups within groups always form seeking an advantage over the rest. Seems like there will always be greedy assholes looking to get over on others sweat and resources, and a majority of cowards who will back their play if they are left enough crumbs to maintain living.

Yes, greed and other negatives are always possible, They are allowed to reign when we get too big as a society to be connected to choose to live in ways that don't support it. Small groups/communities are best and might be the only way to truly achieve freedom and empowerment.

Totally agree.

It all starts in your brain, and if you keep feeding your brain the same information over and over, you're gonna have the same outcome every single time.

What we need is to deconstruct and reverse engineer the very system of our lives. Only then, will we be able to relearn things in a more efficient way.

P.S. I think you meant to write "What they* previously learned..."

What hey previously learned might be wrong

Might wanna edit that out buddy :)

Yes, deconstruct to reconstruct ourselves and the world.

Yes, when I type sometimes I forget the t at the beginning of a word if a t was at the end of the previous word. Thanks.

The funny thing is that really if you sit people down and ask them a series of question? They all actually are anarchist. When you say the word anarchist the indoctrination kicks in and they cannot get behind the word, but still in the heart they are anarchist. LOLOLOLOLOL

Yup, deep down everyone wants freedom, but might not know what it means yet :P

This is OK @krnel that people do not know what freedom is. It is like the first time you try a knew food. You don't know what it taste like, but you have to try it to know if you like it. Some people will have to try it more than once, but will in the end acquire a taste for it, in most cases.

Just keep oozing freedom in your writings!

I am not an optimist v.v. human nature, and I believe that a Constitutional Republic is preferable to pure anarchy because there will always be incorrigibles. I am not willing to give up ANY loved ones (or any major part their fully-functioning healthy bodies) for any such experiment.

Perhaps, I have just not read enough of your particular theory of anarchy though krnel, and am basing my assumptions on previously-received "knowledge." I do see and appreciate your emphasis on "in the short term," but am wondering how we get past the worst of the ill effects of the learning curve.

Anarchy of no rulers is an ideal. We have a long way to go to realize that potential ;)

@krnel, this is a viewpoint i have heard many times over and at certain levels it makes sense.

but anarchy comes with tremendous responsibility. i am not sure that most people can handle it. i can see the beginnings of a dystopian future in this line of reasoning.

we can never change one aspect of human beings and that is of control. We want to control each other. as long as that exists, we are destined to be hierarchical.

if you are talking about anarchy as in Gaia then i think it will happen only when there is no more wealth, disease, hunger, caste, creed, religion and revolution.

It's a long road to an ideal way of freedom for all, but it's possible if we understand how to make it happen :) Self-control in moral alignment will lesson the desire for external control.

Yes, knowledge is everything and if you don't have knowledge regarding the particular aspect then for sure we cannot create the path of that phase of life because we don't know about the essentials of that path of life.

Freedom, responsibility, law and truth should be start from the individual houses and children should get the true and moral teachings then they can create beautiful future life where everyone can live an peaceful life and life of togetherness.

So, what we are transferring to our younger generations is really vital because they are the future walkers and we should create great path for them so that they can walk on the truth and not on the manipulated path.

So, we have to understand the real truth and we all know that truth is difficult to digest but if we can transfer true knowledge then we are doing an great work of wisdom and that is the requirement of the time.

Thanks for sharing this post with us and wishing you an great day. Stay blessed. 🙂

Today July 4th, has me in great thought about the definition of Anarchy being lawless chaos... It should be defined as a state of absolute morality where people swear fealty to respect the lives, property and treasure of others without exception and with no rulers to enforce it.

What say you to the new definition? If agreeable? Pass it on. Happy BBQ day.

yes, that's real anarchy ;)

Curated for #informationwar (by @openparadigm)

  • Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 7,500 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.

  • Join our discord and chat with 150+ fellow Informationwar Activists.

  • Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call Pt 8

Ways you can help the @informationwar

  • Upvote this comment.
  • Delegate Steem Power. 25 SP 50 SP 100 SP
  • Join the curation trail here.
  • Tutorials on all ways to support us and useful resources here