OIG Report: Review of Four FISA Applications and Other Aspects of the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane Investigation

Review of Four FISA Applications and Other Aspects of the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane Investigation

Page 196:

Despite the FBI's efforts to corroborate and evaluate the Steele election
reporting, we were told by the Supervisory Intel Analyst that, as of September
2017, the FBI had corroborated limited information in the Steele election reporting,
and much of that information was publicly available. 352 Most relevant to the Carter
Page FISA applications, the specific substantive allegations contained in Reports 80,
94, 95, and 102, which were relied upon in all four FISA applications, remained
uncorroborated and, in several instances, were inconsistent with information
gathered by the Crossfire Hurricane team. For example, as detailed in Chapters
Five and Seven, these allegations included, among other things, that Page had
secret meetings with Igor Sechin and Igor D.ivyekin in July 2016 and served as an
"intermediary" between Manafort and the Russian government. As we describe in
Chapters Five and Eight, certain information the FBI had obtained did not support
these allegations or the theory in Steele's election reporting that Page was
coordinating, or had coordinated, with Russian government officials on 2016 U.S.
election activities. Additionally, the FBI determined that some of the allegations in
the Steele reporting, including that Trump attorney Michael Cohen had traveled to
Prague in late summer 2016 to meet with Kremlin representatives and that "antiClinton hackers" had been paid by the "[Trump] team" and Kremlin, were not true.

edit: page 413

As a result of the 17 significant inaccuracies and omissions we identified,
relevant information was not shared with, and consequently not considered by,
important Department decision makers and the court, and the FISA applications
made it appear as though the evidence supporting probable cause was stronger
than was actually the case. We also found basic, fundamental, and serious errors
during the completion of the FBl's factual accuracy reviews, known as the Woods
Procedures, which are designed to ensure that FISA applications contain a full and
accurate presentation of the facts.

We are deeply concerned that so many basic and fundamental errors were
made by three separate, hand-picked investigative teams; on one of the most
sensitive FBI investigations; after the matter had been briefed to the highest levels
within the FBI; even though the information sought through use of FISA authority
related so closely to an ongoing presidential campaign; and even though those
involved with the investigation knew that their actions were likely to be subjected
to close scrutiny. We believe this circumstance reflects a failure not just by those
who prepared the FISA applications, but also by the managers and supervisors in
the Crossfire Hurricane chain of command, including FBI senior officials who were
briefed as the investigation progressed.

In the preparation of the FISA applications to surveil Carter Page, the
Crossfire Hurricane team failed to comply with FBI policies, and in so doing fell
short of what is rightfully expected from a premier law enforcement agency
entrusted with such an intrusive surveillance tool. In light of the significant
concerns identified with the Carter Page FISA applications and the other issues
described in this report, the OIG today initiated an audit that will further examine
the FBI's compliance with the Woods Procedures in FISA applications that target
U.S. persons in both counterintelligence and counterterrorism investigations.

edit: footnote page 168:

According
to FBI documents, Mifsud denied having advance knowledge that Russia was in possession of DNC
emails and denied passing any offers or proffers to Papadopoulos. As described in Chapter Eight~ this
information was not included in the later renewal applications.

P. 280

Notes taken by meeting participants indicate that Ohr shared the following
information:

• Simpson hired Steele to research Trump and hired Nellie Ohr to
  perform open source research on Trump;

• Ohr met with Simpson in August 2016 and Simpson provided Ohr with
  the names of three "potential conduits" of information between Russia
  and the Trump campaign;

• Steele's reporting was shared by Simpson with "a lot of people"
  including the Clinton campaign and the Department of State;

• Steele was "desperate" that Trump not be elected, but was providing
  reports for ideological reasons, specifically that "Russia [was] bad;

• Reporting of Kremlin activities "may be exaggerated or conspiracy
  theory talk," so Steele cannot know whether all the reporting is true.

SSA 1 memorialized the meeting with Ohr in an FD-302, which largely
mirrored the attendees' notes, but also provided additional details. 428 SSA 1
documented in the FD-302 that Ohr told the FBI that:

• Steele was "desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was
  passionate about him not being the U.S. President;"

• "Simpson and Steele could have met with [Yahoo] or [Yahoo News
  reporter] jointly, but Ohr [did] not know if they did;" and

• Ohr "knew" that Simpson was "hired by a lawyer who does opposition
  research" and that Steele's reporting was being distributed to "the
  Clinton Campaign, Jon Winer at the U.S. State Department and the
  FBI.

https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf

Attorney General William P. Barr issued the following statement:

"Nothing is more important than the credibility and integrity of the FBI and the Department of Justice. That is why we must hold our investigators and prosecutors to the highest ethical and professional standards. The Inspector General’s investigation has provided critical transparency and accountability, and his work is a credit to the Department of Justice. I would like to thank the Inspector General and his team.

The Inspector General’s report now makes clear that the FBI launched an intrusive investigation of a U.S. presidential campaign on the thinnest of suspicions that, in my view, were insufficient to justify the steps taken. It is also clear that, from its inception, the evidence produced by the investigation was consistently exculpatory. Nevertheless, the investigation and surveillance was pushed forward for the duration of the campaign and deep into President Trump’s administration. In the rush to obtain and maintain FISA surveillance of Trump campaign associates, FBI officials misled the FISA court, omitted critical exculpatory facts from their filings, and suppressed or ignored information negating the reliability of their principal source. The Inspector General found the explanations given for these actions unsatisfactory. While most of the misconduct identified by the Inspector General was committed in 2016 and 2017 by a small group of now-former FBI officials, the malfeasance and misfeasance detailed in the Inspector General’s report reflects a clear abuse of the FISA process.

FISA is an essential tool for the protection of the safety of the American people. The Department of Justice and the FBI are committed to taking whatever steps are necessary to rectify the abuses that occurred and to ensure the integrity of the FISA process going forward.

No one is more dismayed about the handling of these FISA applications than Director Wray. I have full confidence in Director Wray and his team at the FBI, as well as the thousands of dedicated line agents who work tirelessly to protect our country. I thank the Director for the comprehensive set of proposed reforms he is announcing today, and I look forward to working with him to implement these and any other appropriate measures.

With respect to DOJ personnel discussed in the report, the Department will follow all appropriate processes and procedures, including as to any potential disciplinary action."

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/statement-attorney-general-william-p-barr-inspector-generals-report-review-four-fisa

“I have the utmost respect for the mission of the Office of Inspector General and the comprehensive work that went into the report prepared by Mr. Horowitz and his staff. However, our investigation is not limited to developing information from within component parts of the Justice Department. Our investigation has included developing information from other persons and entities, both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened.”

https://www.justice.gov/usao-ct/pr/statement-us-attorney-john-h-durham