“Precrime” is applied in China, the initial experiment

I don't know if you remember a Tom Cruise movie, I think it was from the early 2000s, titled Minority Report, in this movie Tom Cruise plays a kind of police officer, and in the police there is a department called the pre-crime department, where there are some teenagers, I don't really know what they are, who are there in a pool and connected, by means of cables, their brains to what is happening on the entire Internet and they are able to predict when a crime is going to occur.

This seems like science fiction, well no more, no more, this has already been invented and this has been presented recently, as you can see in this Objective article on Monday, June 8 in the Object newspaper, with the following headline: "China develops artificial intelligence to detect critics of the government before they manifest themselves." Keep an eye on the data,

why's that? because we are a very democratic government and this seems like nonsense, but it is not nonsense at all, because it has been seen on countless occasions of the more than evident attempts that the different administrations, both Chinese and European, have to control what is said on social networks, in fact, and it is something that has driven me crazy.

The company is called Hedge Networks, which is developing this artificial intelligence and this company has a great advantage and that is that the Chinese “democratic” state, which is a very democratic state, which gets along wonderfully with Zapatero and Pedro Sánchez, they are always there because where democracy is, Pedro goes and José Luis goes, they go to the sources of democracy and China is a democratic country.

Based on everything they control on the Internet, they are able to predict that there will come a time when this person is going to burst and start attacking the government and before that happens he is punished and here in Europe something very similar is being done, in Europe we do not have that self-confidence, or at least it has not yet arrived, but there is a European legislation known as the "digital services law" that will come into force now at the end of the year, which, well, this law aims to control the content, platforms must implement systems to mitigate the risks of dissemination of illicit or false content, protection of minors, we will all agree there; Artificial intelligence management.

Also the copyright law, among other things, but there is also an issue, because all this about the European Union is the same, if one is looking for very specific and critical content, first they come up with about 20 that suit them, the public newspaper channel, that is, channels that only inform you in a certain direction, of course, the same platform.

If something that they have promised you has to be one way, then it is not like that, because what happens happens, and in the end, the only thing that is achieved is to limit your ability to have different points of view on a certain topic and the content creators, it limits your freedom of expression, just like China, we are becoming the socialist republics of the European Union and Sánchez will surely be in the middle.

And this is what is happening, that is, in England today you commit any crime, according to them a crime, for me they are expressions of complaining about something and one party is always more right than the other. The most paradigmatic case is that of this boy Henry Nowak, this boy had been stabbed by a Hindu from the SIC sect, who with their customs and traditions is to walk down the street with a dagger, because he stabbed him several times in the side with a dagger and the boy was on the ground dying, the police arrive and say, "I have insulted myself, he has called me a crime that I am an Indian, that I am bad, what about it, then they take it." And the one who is stabbed is chained, they are shackled and the kid drowns to death.

That is what we are going for, and that is not freedom of expression, no matter how much any “leader” or the pope or whoever wants to sell us, there are very simple methodologies to control social networks without violating the freedom of expression of the creators or the freedom of choice that the public has and it is the same thing that is used in advertising, the self-control system. self-control, no more than a court where a judge specialized in these quick trial issues is represented.

There we are confused because sentences are not issued, recommendations are issued so that a judge then abides by them or not abides by them, generally he abides by them. There is the judge, there are the representatives of the social networks, the television stations, whoever, and there are the advertisers and an agreement is reached and that agreement, this mediation saves many costs of judicial management, but at the same time it allows people not to lose their freedom of expression, nor their freedom of movement and for everyone to be happy, but this is not what the administrations seek, the administration does not care about freedom, and what it wants is submission.

And this is what is going to happen at the end of the year here in Europe, the same as in China, which is the first step, because first you start by breaking up social networks, which is what is going to be done everywhere, and then when you skip it, you will be giving them a reason to come home to pay you a visit, and that visit is not going to be very kind, I can tell you that these people use violence in its purest form and since they have their lackeys in middle or high management The commanders of the different police forces, the guards or the national street police cannot do absolutely anything. And this is the situation that we are going to find ourselves in. Meanwhile, people here say absolutely nothing.