Thank you so much @starkerz and also thanks to each and everyone involved with this proposal. I think this is a must if we all agree to "think in Steem/Steemit for the long run".

Some things I can see more clearly while becoming an "rookie investor and entrepreneur":

• The most valuable tech companies¹ out there, became what they are today by evolving, changing, thinking "out of the box", etc. They have become the greatest and they have never stopped to flow in a consistent way. Let's say Netflix as an example, it has a proven-record of adapting itself in order to be the best. Those are the examples we must follow if we want the EcosystemSteem to grow. If you take a look of any of those companies, since 1 or 2 years ago, you will notice almost an exponential growth.
• Even that we(as Steem Blockchain) provide a better "solution/idea" to the people², it is imperative to make it more sustainable and it is a must start thinking pro-Steemians. Especially those (like me) who don't have enormous stakes of SP. The wales should start thinking in this way in order to contribute for the better.
• Steem can survive without many people right? I know it is been proved already. I mean if the minority (big whales and steem massive holders) continue voting themselves over and over, they could still make a lot of money. My question for them is: "Do you realise you could make even much more money if Steemit becomes massive?". Have you ever thought about what would be if 1 STEEM could reach the same price as 1 Ethereum? Have we ever analysed what do we need to make it happen? Are we willing to make it happen, seriously?
• Proof of time®. This is new definition I would like to propose, I will explain this. Since I became a Steemian, I putted my 200% in order to understand how to make it work for me. This took me more than 4 hours per day, in a 7 months time basis. This would be around 840 hours. This, ladies and gentlemen, this is "The Proof of Time" within the EcoSteem. Basically I can say that an average person will need around 500 hours of their time in order to get accepted in a nice guild/community/club such as sndbox. Have we ever thought if an average person would have this determination? Could this be avoided somehow?.
• What happen if the next year 1 STEEM = $0.01?. This would mean my profile would worth about $18.32. I guess I would go away without a second thought. What would happen if the next year 1 STEEM = $10. My profile would worth about $18316.69. This would mean something to me. This would mean 1 year of my life, while promoting STEEM, while I was doing a lot of research by myself would worth a bit more than the average year salary of a person (with a wage under the minimum) within an average country.
• So I must repeat this because it is important to leave it as the final idea: What would happen if the greater/almighty/masters of STEEM/whales/Gods of "great content" start thinking out of the box and also out of their pointless greed?

PS: If those who have the most powerful accounts could realise the power they have in hands, the potential they have, maybe...and just maybe, it could be a brighter future for all members within the ECOsystemSTEEM. Yes I know, my english "is not very good looking"

1: There is no need to tell you the names. As soon as I said "The most valuable companies" you've got the picture, also, I consider we "as Steem Ecosystem", we are part of a tech company with huge potential.

2: I don't see FB giving money away to professional bloggers. I don't see twitter giving away money to save Darthnava's life, do you?

gif diseñado por @orelmely

. .
Saturno Mangieri - Asesor de Tecnologías Blockchain

icons from icons8.com