RE: Universal laws explained - The first law Part 1
I love a lot of this, but I’m also not sure about a lot of it.
For example, when you say that all physical reality is made up of vibrations of energy and that this doesn’t have to be proved, how are there still physists out there working on trying to figure out, what, exactly, makes up physical reality and how to prove it?
LQG proponents moved away from the “tiny vibrating energy strings” idea into tiny quantized granular packets of space-time connected together as spin networks...not much vibrating energy going on there. And they may be very very wrong.
But isn’t this something on which the science still isn’t fully settled?
I love your message, I hope you don’t take this as criticism of the intentions and message.
It just threw me off a bit when you referenced “reality as vibrating energy” as being axiomatic.