Inflationary and Deflationary model implications on the economy of the token ecosystems.

A token ecosystem refers to a digital economy that is based on blockchain initiatives. These systems involve payment, reward system, governance and access to services through token. As in the case with national economies, the supply of money (or tokens) is extremely significant.

Inflationary and deflationary models are two typical models of token ecosystem. The models influence the way individuals utilize, store, invest and market tokens. This essay will elaborate on the economic implications of both models in very simple terms.

A token model is an inflationary token model in which new tokens are being made constantly. This implies that the aggregate supply continues to rise. This model is used by many blockchain networks to reward the validators, miners or stakers.

As an example, new tokens were frequently emitted as a reward in networks, such as Ethereum (pre major upgrades). Inflationary models are primarily aimed at participation. When individuals realize that they can get some new tokens by contributing to the network, they will tend to contribute the same.

But there are economic effects of inflation. The value of each token can be lowered in case the demand does not increase proportionally as the number of tokens increases. It is just like what occurs in the traditional economies whereby governments print excessive money.

The prices can be increased and buying capacity can decrease. This in token ecosystems can decrease investor confidence. In the event that holders predict that the value of the token will decline with time, they can sell sooner than to hold it. This may augment the volatility of the market.

On the bright note, inflationary models have the capacity of enhancing liquidity. The more tokens are scattered around in the form of a reward, the more people possess and redeem them. This may facilitate active trading and powerful network effects.

In my opinion, inflation can assist growth in an initial phase of a project. It disseminates tokens to numerous users and does not allow early investors to be in charge of all things. It is also able to make the system appear more inclusive.

Conversely, the aggregate supply of tokens increases with time in a deflationary token model. This may occur by burning of tokens, limiting the supply capacity, or by lowering issumption.

The most famous one is Bitcoin, the total coins of which are fixed at 21 million. There will never be any more than this amount. Others also burn tokens on a regular basis and they are out of circulation forever. This is aimed at ensuring that tokens become scarce.

Scarcity has the potential to create value in case the demand is high. The individuals who think that a token will become scarcer with time can choose to retain it rather than spending it. This is capable of causing price appreciation.

Image Source

This provides a high saving motive economically. Deflationary tokens are considered by investors as digital gold. As a matter of fact, Bitcoin is being compared to gold by many as a result of its scarcity.

However, there are risks of deflationary models as well. Users might decide to cease spending the token, in case they feel that the price of this token will continue to increase. This slows down the level of transactions in the ecosystem.

An asset that is not actively utilized but owned by many people may decrease the actual usefulness of the platform. Simply put, the digital economy can stagnate in case everyone is saving and no one is spending. This is like deflation in the traditional economies where demoralizing prices may lower the activity of the economy.

Inequality is another consequence of the economy. In systems with deflation, there is a tendency of those who adopt in the early stages to gain the most. When an individual purchases the tokens when they are young and at a low rate and retains them, he or she may have a big portion of the wealth when the price shoots up.

This has the potential to generate wealth concentration. Conversely, this effect might be lower under an inflationary system since new tokens are constantly given out.

The velocity of the token is also significant. Token velocity refers to the frequency of change of a token between hands. The models of inflation tend to accelerate the velocity since individuals are less encouraged to store tokens over a prolonged period of time.

Deflationary models tend to slow down velocity since users are inclined to save. Active ecosystems can be maintained with high velocity but excessive velocity leads to instability. Slow speed can stabilize the price but can decrease the usage. Two extremes have to be struck by designers of token economies.

Another area that is impacted by these models is governance. In most decentralized projects, the holders of the tokens vote. Voting power can vary with time in an inflationary system because new tokens are introduced.

In the deflation systems, individuals who already possess a good deal of it can stay in control over a long period. This influences decentralization and equity. I believe it is among the most significant yet little talked of economic consequences.

Market psychology is also significant. When inflation is moderate and predictable, its users might tend to put more emphasis on utility rather than speculation in inflationary systems. Speculation may be the order of the day in deflationary systems. It is possible that people purchase tokens simply because they believe it will raise in price and not because they are interested in using the platform. This has the ability of generating bubbles and sharp crashes.

Conclusively, both the deflationary and inflationary models have a good economic implication in token ecosystems. The models of inflation aid in the growth, participation and liquidity, but could lower the value of tokens when supply increases too rapidly. Deflationary models generate scarcity and may raise value, but they are likely to lower spending and raise inequality.

There is no perfect model. The most appropriate one is subject to the objectives of a project, its development progress, and human occupation. I think a moderate measure between regulated inflation and such mechanisms as burning of tokens can be the most sustainable economic solution.