The Dynamics of Liquidity Bootstrapping Pools in Early-Stage Token Launches

Liquidity Bootstrapping Pools (LBPs) are ansibiotic manner of introducing new crypto tokens. They are primarily applied in the initial stages of a token sale, when a project is in its inception and aims at selling its token to the community. Simply, an LBP is a type of smart contract pool, which assists a project in selling its token, in addition to being able to change its price with the course of time. I am quite intrigued by LBPs as they attempt to address most of the issues that the older forms of token launch had.

Traditional token launches usually employed fixed prices or auctions. This could be problematic at times. An example is when a token is introduced at low fixed price many buyers would rush to purchase it at once. This may result in gas wars where individuals charge very high transaction charges to beat first. It may also cause unequal allocation, where big investors (so-called whales) acquire the majority of the tokens before small investors get an opportunity. Consequently, the token price can increase very rapidly and then plummet down as rapidly.

Liquidity Bootstrapping Pools were developed in order to mitigate such issues. They tend to be constructed on automated market maker (AMM) systems such as Balancer. In an LBP, the project team develops a pool containing two tokens. One of the tokens is the new token under launching. The other one tends to be one of the popular tokens like Ethereum or a stablecoin like USD Coin. The initial weight of the new token and the other token is a high and low weight respectively. The weights slowly change with time.

Image Source

The most important dynamic of an LBP is this change in weights. When a token is first sold, the price of the new token is relatively high due to the high weight of the pool. As time goes, the weight of the new token reduces, and the weight of the other token is added. This makes the price of the new token decrease, slowly, in case there is no purchasing power. And therefore instead of low and then high, it starts high and then gradually declines. Buyers then make a decision on when to enter. When they believe that they are charged excessively they wait. When they believe they are being fair they purchase.

This processes alters the buyer behavior. It also lessens the impulse to make a purchase at the moment in most instances. This is because the price will decrease with time meaning that there is less pressure to compete during the initial few minutes. Customers are able to monitor the market and make a thorough decision. I think that this will bring about a more relaxed and deliberate atmosphere prior to token allocation at an early stage. It has a larger price discovery room left to itself.

The other significant dynamic is capital efficiency. A project might require to supply huge quantities of both tokens in a conventional liquidity pool to generate deep liquidity. However, in an LBP, the project will be able to supply a high quantity of its own token and a lower quantity of the complementary token. The pool is still effective since the weights have changed. This minimizes the capital required by the project to tie up in the beginning. This is quite useful in case of projects that have less funds and are in an initial stage.

There is also increased transparency through Liquidity Bootstrapping Pools. The pool regulations, including the initial weights, final weights and time are coded into the smart contract. They can be viewed by all long before the start of the launch. This minimizes uncertainty and concealed changes. The buyers have the knowledge on how the price curve would act in the long run even though they lack the information of what the market truly wants. This transparency is highly valued in projects at the initial stages where trust is yet to be established.

However, LBPs are not perfect. One of them is that in case there is so high demand the price can increase rapidly though the weight is reducing. The reason behind this is that the automated market maker formula modifies the price with regard to trades. Whether it is a large number of people purchasing simultaneously, the price may increase even when the pressure is intended to be downwards. Conversely, when the demand is low, the price can go too low and this can develop a negative image of the project. Therefore, LBPs lead the price movement but not completely.

It is also a psychological dynamic. As the price will be high initially and will decrease with time, buyers will be confused of when to make purchase. When they wait too long, other people can purchase and drive the price up once again. When they make their purchase too early, the price can keep on declining. This balances the patience and risk. I think this dynamic can be more strategic thinking than first-come-first-serve sales.

Long-term liquidity is another significant factor. Once the LBP is over, the project tends to convert to a normal liquidity pool. By now, tokens were given to a number of holders. Ideally, this will result in a healthier market structure, with less abrupt price crashes as a result of immediate investors selling their tokens. The process of price discovery that happens throughout the LBP stage can provide assistance in establishing a more sustainable initial point of the existence of the token in the open market.

In the initial stages of tokens issuance, reputation and fairness are of high significance. Liquidity Bootstrapping Pools are trying to match the interests of the project with those of the community. The project desires reasonable price and extensive distribution. The society desires openness and even-handedness. Although no system can be called perfect, LBPs is a brilliant financial architecture that applies smart contracts and automated pricing to enhance the process of launching a product.

To conclude, the dynamics of the Liquidity Bootstrapping Pools are constructed using the shifts in token weights, price discovery, capital efficiency, and transparent rules. They slow down the rush and unfair advantages experienced in most traditional tokens launches. Simultaneously, they also leave the determination of the final price to the market by buying and selling. I consider LBPs as a significant innovation in decentralized finance, particularly to projects in the first stage, which seek to be launched fairly and in a structured manner.