You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Smoke Radio Episode #1 - Cannabis Crypto & Market Size
@FUZZYVEST/ @OFFICIALFUZZY IS PART OF THIS SCHEME AND WE ALL KNOW WHERE HIS PROJECTS END UP!!!
D.E.A.D.
DON'T WASTE YOUR TIME. FIND ANOTHER SHITCOIN THAT MAY ACTUALLY HAVE A CHANCE.
Wow bud. We have more than one advisor on our team, and he is not directly responsible for anything at Smoke Network.
We also have a working test-net as well as MVP, a pitch deck, a 64 page whitepaper and many other assets, including buying Steem power so that we can upvote cannabis related posts. If you look just a few seconds into this show you will also realize it took a lot of effort.
But anyways, we value your opinion and will certainly not be a dead project. See you at launch.
Well, the only thing he could possibly advise on is how to talk a big game while swindling others, so I look forward to see when that comes into play.
We hope you understand that our team is highly capable of making their own decisions and the advisors take very little roll in the day to day activities.
We also hope you keep an eye on our project and at least take a squizz at our other assets. Keep in mind we raised very little pre-sale and have used it very diligently to grow our community as well as build what we think will be an awesome product for stoners.
We are by no means trying to 'swindle' anyone and even have a backup plan to launch the chain without a main ICO in worst case scenarios. We also have a current airdrop campaign to allow for our own distribution methods.
Anyways, again. We value your opinion (Even if we do not value your phat downvotes from randowhale ;) ) and we hope to see you at the launch of our chain to check in and see that it was not a scam or dead project.... and hopefully not just another shitcoin either (As we truly believe in DPoS and mutual aid society concepts, including over 100 man hours into the issues the steem chain currently has...).
Perhaps if you had approached us a little bit better, maybe via email and gave us warnings with proof of these ill doings of fuzzy we would take that under advisement as well.
We also notice you have issues with Steem and this is one of the reasons why we planned to go with our own chain...
We think you and our team are on the same side with some things, it is a pity the personal feelings you have for one of our advisors, which is not even responsible for the network in any way, has made you take this stance without even approaching us, as we believe you could even been an asset on our chain.. We know you like cannabis content as you used to upvote many cannabis related posts in 2016.
We also understand there has been many scams and long-winded projects that have never gone anywhere but we are fucking hard working people and will get this done no matter what comes along to try and stop us.
Pitty you so jaded now mate.
I don't agree with you here, I've not experienced a bad project of fuzzy's & I've been participating in both the beyondbitcoin and bitshares hangouts the last couple years.
There have been people that talked on the shows that didn't live up to their promises however this doesn't reflect upon fuzzy, rather an unfortunate consequence of a truly open teleconference platform created by fuzzy and hangout attendees.
I'm very positive about the future of the smoke network, they're planning on giving a huge amount away through the airdrop and are going to run their own separate blockchain (not steem nor eos).
I honestly think Bernie is just triggered because in our previous post he said we should take down mentioning fuzzy and we didn't.
I bet deep down he loves the Smoke Network.
You know what they say about those that downvote you for no clear reason
;)
Unfortunately, you’re going to learn how wrong you are the difficult way.
Is there not an easy way to explain how they're wrong?
What specific projects of fuzzy's have you been burned by?
Whatever it is/was it only serves as more of a driver to get our chain launched and prove him wrong. . . As much as people hate @berniesanders, we still respect him, and his vote on steem chain.
If he wants to downvote the shit outa any and all projects that post on here that talk to @officalfuzzy or work with him in any way, that's his perogative. Perhaps it does help in warning future projects to not use Steem as a platform for marketing or post updates... We have clearly seen @ned and others do not appreciate @dan blogging on here about EOS either.
We would love a dialogue that is a little more than just scam accusations tho...
I was under the impression even @dan chatted with @officialfuzzy years ago on a beyondbitcoin show, I guess Steem and EOS are scams too :?
We still think it is a pitty he does not see value in the work we have done, including marketing through things like the radio show initiative and how much value is in our lists and sign up distro.
... And also the value in another DPoS chain.
Also, we used to having cannabis related posts censored on social media. This is not a new occurrence...
There is a reason everyone who is anyone has distanced themselves from him, eventually you'll figure it out.
I am sure we will. . .
. . . I still wish you would have emailed us or something so that we could have discussed this and other issues the Steem chain faces.
I would have loved to pick your brain on some of the forks and what you would do to improve the UX in a way to shape the content and user flow.
Such is life, I'm sure a competitor will come along soon enough I can support. Good luck to you guys.