Great post. But I don't know if that would really be the way. Steem brings a hybrid form of passive and active feedback. my returns here are far greater than other passive rents like Neo, KCS. My perspective is first to control the bad investors, who take away much of the platform by doing accounts, maintaining centralized operation between these accounts. That's the hard part. Another is the question of having tools that make it easier to build dapps without programming, or few as possible. We have a deficit of programmers, especially in countries like mine. We are not profitable to develop activities elsewhere with our returm here, os even another crypto. And lastly the market is all down, it lacks investors as a whole. I believe that as long as we do not foster social functioning Here, we do not grow. We have a lot of faith to invest here, as in cryptos, not for the idea, but for other ways of investing. We has a large and strong community, but totally disjointed, one in each direction. Maybe the governance model will help. I personally believe that capital is a consequence of the social and not the other way around. When need more decentralize, even in tecnology, and offer to the common social, forms of use, invest and build in communities of different countries and cultures, more return on capital will be. Thanks for the post and reflection!