You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Separate downvoting power pool concept visualized.
Since Reddit has no direct monetary incentives and that the up and downvotes are anonymized it is good starting point for choosing a UP:DOWN ratio.
Is this really a valid assumption? Using data from a non-monetized and anonymous platform as a model of what to do on a monetized not-anonymous platform seems like a leap of faith.
Having more flags would automatically take attention away from the few who do, making flagging more anonymized. Since most people think flagging take away money instead of redistributing it's better to rely on a system with no monetization to see what a normal behavior is.
9:1 is a suggestion 1:20 could be used at first.
Explanation for high upvote
The fact that it´d cost less to flag could very well be a reason for many users to make use of it more often, which again would decrease the fear among Minnows & Dolphins as well to flag bigger accounts with crappy content.
The Downside could be though that we´ll see new flag wars being started which could reach epic proportions due to the cheaper availability. So I think it´s a good idea in general but shouldn´t lead to very low costs of flagging after all. A higher ratio might therefore be the better choice to go with in the beginning.
Amazing Idea of the post
Very good excilent information for us
Plz check my post
https://steemit.com/photography/@hkniazi/i-am-visiting-international-restaurant-kashmir-hotel-and-restaurant-a4f6ed7d0497d