The hypocrisy and abuse of @berniesanders and @abusereports, a detailed analysis

Hello all, this will be a follow up to my previous post, "The irony of @abusereports, a system designed to fight abuse, run by the biggest abuser on steem".

@berniesanders continues to be the center of hypocrisy and idiocy in the steemit world with his continued unjustified flagging, upvoting of low effort content, and self voting from nearly 70 accounts. All the while, he promotes his moral integrity in creating systems to flag those he dislikes while maintaining the idea that he is "reporting abuse".

This is not to say he doesn't have his fans. Those who adamantly agree with bernie without thinking are also rewarded for their loyalty.

There is also a strange dichotomy between @berniesanders and @haejin, we must not forget to mention. @berniesanders serves as the leader of the group effort to flag @haejin, among @transisto and a few others. I have nothing against @transisto, besides his ignorance to whom he is working with- a far greater evil than @haejin. This situation will ultimately lead to failure if we criticize haejin and fail to criticize berniesanders.

@Haejin has been abusively upvoting his posts for the past 4 months. @Berniesanders has been doing the same for over a year.
Most importantly, Haejin's abuse is transparent. Anyone can see that Haejin has been receiving too much of the reward pool, though it takes more digging and forethought to understand how @berniesanders could be causing more damage than @haejin.

@berniesanders owns hundreds of accounts. Though I am uncertain of the exact figure, he repeatedly upvotes himself with around 60, mainly using his 7 @nextgencrypto @thecyclist @ngc @yougotflagged @thedelegator @steemservices and @berniesanders.

@berniesanders self voting figure is around 61% at the time of writing this post, which serves to be true if he does not vote differently through any accounts. @abusereports self voting figure is around 74%. He will be taking about 3,000 SBD from the reward pool in the next 7 days. He has posted 3 times, none of which have been greater than 10 sentences. All of his @abusereports posts are automated.

Here is a screenshot of @abusereports latest daily flag report.

Notice anything fishy? There are certain accounts with dozens removed.. and also dozens of accounts with only $0.27 removed.

From a quick glance at the accounts, I can see that @cryptokidd, @beanz, @heyitskolin and @ran-a-banana are all innocent steemians, who are not committing abuse. @gpuhead is also innocent but boy does he post some cringy comments on porn. 😂

This would mean $152 of the $176.82 was taken away from steemians who did not commit abuse. How is this okay?

Many of these steemians are also on the @abusereports blacklist, meaning anything they post will be met with spam. I was also previously on the blacklist.

Boy what a lovely account. Boy do I wonder why steem user retention is so low.

I will be reporting @abusereports to @steemcleaners for as long as it continues to spam and flag innocent people. Let me know if there is any other way this account can be reported.

I will be asking the same three questions as last post :

How many of nextgencrypto's witness votes are even real people?

How many innocent people has abusereports flagged?

What are ways in which steem can be changed to prevent massive system-wide abuse like this?

I would love to hear your answers in the comments.

❤️Stuart❤️