You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The State of Steem - August Expansion

in #steemit7 years ago

What @troglodactyl said is correct: steemit has to pay the blockchain for the accounts that it gives away for free. And it's difficult for them to be sure they don't hand out a lot of free accounts to the same person, they need to verify their identity to avoid that.

Sort:  

So the solution would be hire a person to only do that(verify identities)... or even contract a verify system that can do that automatically such as netVerify for instance. Dont you think that?

And why ned or dan didnt take into consideration that this WILL happen? Another solution might be a way to charge us i dont know like the 1% of our curation or post rewards to help the account creation cost. Personally i think that the new users are the gold rush here and everywhere! Or Coca-Cola is what it is because it have only 300.000 users around the world? I dont think so. It's one of the reasons i have not been writing post yet. Because my followers in the others social platforms wont wait one month or more to get their Accounts approved! And as you may know, take the attention of people on something isn't easy. Once you have their attention, you have to do/give/provide the best, and the best is not have to wait such a long time for sign up.

Take into consideration my 1% fee or something like that for a "pool to pay the fees involucrated into account creation"