Weekly Steem Stats Report - February 12 - 45,899 new accounts!
Last week, 45,899 new accounts were created... A new weekly record!
Welcome to my Steem Stats Report for Monday, February 12, 2018. All data comes directly from the Steem blockchain and is based on UTC time.
The format of the date fields is 'YYYYWW'.
I.e. 201806 is week 6 of 2018 (from Monday, February 5 to Sunday, Februari 11 2018).
1. Weekly number of Posts (including comments)
| Date | Posts |
|---|---|
| 201806 | 1,742,827 |
| 201805 | 1,852,875 |
| 201804 | 1,884,636 |
| 201803 | 1,637,436 |
| 201802 | 1,682,961 |
| 201801 | 1,552,844 |
| 201752 | 1,174,784 |
2. Weekly number of votes
| Date | Votes |
|---|---|
| 201806 | 4,712,805 |
| 201805 | 4,931,440 |
| 201804 | 4,675,230 |
| 201803 | 4,569,838 |
| 201802 | 4,455,903 |
| 201801 | 5,180,640 |
| 201752 | 4,323,682 |
3. Daily active users (per week)
| Date | Active users |
|---|---|
| 201806 | 432,210 |
| 201805 | 436,194 |
| 201804 | 409,494 |
| 201803 | 366,457 |
| 201802 | 355,855 |
| 201801 | 371,153 |
| 201752 | 306,297 |
4. Posts + Comments per post
| Date | Average # comments | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 201806 | 2.28 | 531,228 |
| 201805 | 2.32 | 557,894 |
| 201804 | 2.41 | 553,239 |
| 201803 | 2.38 | 484,596 |
| 201802 | 2.40 | 494,759 |
| 201801 | 2.45 | 450,567 |
| 201752 | 2.45 | 340,946 |
5. New accounts created
| Date | New Accounts |
|---|---|
| 201806 | 45,899 |
| 201805 | 39,059 |
| 201804 | 34,851 |
| 201803 | 31,057 |
| 201802 | 27,258 |
| 201801 | 33,676 |
| 201752 | 18,827 |
6. Weekly Amount of Steem Powered UP & DOWN
| Date | Powered UP | Powered DOWN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 201806 | 1,143,445 STEEM | 6,650,390 STEEM | -5,506,945 STEEM |
| 201805 | 9,247,335 STEEM | 6,407,731 STEEM | 2,839,604 STEEM |
| 201804 | 1,093,917 STEEM | 6,707,362 STEEM | -5,613,445 STEEM |
| 201803 | 4,909,151 STEEM | 6,773,146 STEEM | -1,863,995 STEEM |
| 201802 | 2,244,760 STEEM | 1,147,673 STEEM | 1,097,087 STEEM |
| 201801 | 1,466,068 STEEM | 1,235,334 STEEM | 230,734 STEEM |
| 201752 | 1,299,906 STEEM | 1,089,293 STEEM | 210,613 STEEM |
| Average p/d | 1,939,889 STEEM | 2,121,424 STEEM | -181,536 STEEM |
Largest 'Power ups' last week
| Date & Time | From | To | STEEM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 01:25 | @trevonjb | @trevonjb | 82,269.510 |
| Feb 7, 19:00 | @vincentcestone | @vincentcestone | 56,741.122 |
| Feb 6, 04:58 | @yoo1900 | @yoo1900 | 48,649.037 |
| Feb 10, 22:46 | @totolina | @totolina | 29,249.622 |
| Feb 10, 14:36 | @steemaccess | @steemaccess | 21,633.603 |
| Feb 5, 23:12 | @jayzel | @jayzel | 21,057.805 |
| Feb 6, 21:04 | @hr1 | @hr1 | 20,458.050 |
| Feb 5, 15:28 | @trevonjb | @trevonjb | 20,266.029 |
| Feb 10, 02:00 | @z8teyb289qav9z | @z8teyb289qav9z | 20,000.001 |
| Feb 5, 19:03 | @thejohalfiles | @thejohalfiles | 20,000.000 |
7. Weekly Steem Transfers from and to exchanges
| Date | From Bittrex | From Poloniex | From Binance | To Bittrex | To Poloniex | To Binance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 201806 | 898,200 STEEM | 0 STEEM | 281,145 STEEM | 1,053,381 STEEM | 104 STEEM | 306,139 STEEM |
| 201805 | 2,164,559 STEEM | 0 STEEM | 0 STEEM | 2,327,600 STEEM | 9,686 STEEM | 1,592,244 STEEM |
| 201804 | 1,217,869 STEEM | 1,113,765 STEEM | 0 STEEM | 3,129,704 STEEM | 620,124 STEEM | 0 STEEM |
| 201803 | 1,237,099 STEEM | 1,144,294 STEEM | 0 STEEM | 1,990,342 STEEM | 627,652 STEEM | 0 STEEM |
| 201802 | 1,635,828 STEEM | 1,030,243 STEEM | 0 STEEM | 1,864,464 STEEM | 1,106,837 STEEM | 0 STEEM |
| 201801 | 2,041,953 STEEM | 2,970,118 STEEM | 0 STEEM | 5,710,354 STEEM | 1,902,677 STEEM | 0 STEEM |
| 201752 | 1,322,680 STEEM | 1,054,067 STEEM | 0 STEEM | 1,745,730 STEEM | 647,371 STEEM | 0 STEEM |
Largest transfers last week
| Date & Time | From | To | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 08:23 | @deepcrypto8 | @binance-hot | 1,640,655.727 STEEM |
| Feb 7, 04:08 | @steemit2 | @alpha | 600,000.000 STEEM |
| Feb 8, 01:36 | @steemit2 | @fdcb934e6cce | 75,000.000 STEEM |
| Feb 5, 23:49 | @val-a | @bittrex | 60,000.000 STEEM |
| Feb 7, 18:59 | @binance-hot | @vincentcestone | 56,741.122 STEEM |
| Feb 8, 05:00 | @val-a | @bittrex | 55,000.000 STEEM |
| Feb 8, 17:12 | @steemit2 | @steem | 50,000.000 STEEM |
| Feb 5, 21:00 | @bittrex | @yoo1900 | 48,547.812 STEEM |
| Feb 9, 16:35 | @blocktrades | @bittrex | 40,000.000 STEEM |
| Feb 7, 20:33 | @alpha | @bittrex | 40,000.000 STEEM |
8. Steem Price Update
Hmm, seeing Trevon James on the largest "Power-ups" list is extremely disheartening, because he can do a lot of harm to people here on Steemit with that amount of power... hopefully the whales continue to keep him in check.
I guess in his last post he kind of gives a hint that he is not going to post anymore on Steemit.
However, I think that it is against Steemit culture - censorship is what Facebook is all about, not Steemit. From one side people want freedom of speech and from other they prefer censorship. I do not know the correct wording in english - Steemit community is full of hypocrisy and double standards.
Understand though, that the majority, if not all the content he promotes has scams in it, and I think the whales have all the right in the world to clean that trash up, because think about it, Trevon made millions in referral earning via BitConnect, so he can easily cheat himself to the top.
That's why they have an issue with him.
Could you argue that this is a form of censorship, yes, but it is dangerous to let people like him loose on a pay-to-win platform.
If what you say is true, then probably the police is already after him. If this is not the case, then you are abusing him with false allegations.
About scams or other content. He is very good promoter. That is a fact. This is not a bad thing. However, unfortunately most of the "projects" he is promoting seems to be scam. That, I believe, is likely to be true as well. And that is a bad thing. I totally agree with that. And probably he knows about that as well.
So, why he is doing that?
I do not know. Probably because there are a lot of people who need to get a good lesson and like to be fooled with a Get-Rich-Quick Schemes. Since there are a big demand in such schemes, then there should be a people who promote them. He choose to be one of them. Good for him? Do not know. We'll see. I hope that this lawsuit will show us who is who.
Hmm, I think I get what you are saying, but people like this should not have the ability to come over here on Steemit, and use all their ill-gotten gains they earned via referral money off the backs of a bunch of poor people who lost thousands of dollars... just my opinion.
There are a lot more people on Steemit I wish they were muted or even put in a jail. 😉 They did even worse things. But that is my opinion and until I can prove that, I keep it to myself.
For our World to be in balance and lessons learned, there needs to be both kinds of people - the ones we like and don't.
Just because he doesn't make any post rewards doesn't mean he is being censored. That's probably bitconnect profits he earned by referring users that lost a lot of money that he is powering up onto Steem now and I'd be okay with him not earning anything with it.
I think he ragequit: see "Not posting anymore.."
Ironic that he did so when he powered-up so much.
Probably trying to hide as much money as he can before his assets are frozen by the feds. Takes a long time to power down... He can deligate his steempower and earn a good passive income from his jail cell. Lol
Ha! I think he tried that with Minnow Booster, but then they kicked him out.
Lol nice
Time for those juicy stats!
omg 45k its amazing nd gd for steem growth
What do you mean with steem growth?
More steem or a price increase?
growth in every field of steem and its price
I still have some difficulties to understand the steemit concept. For example why would the steem price increase if we get more users? And what value do your comments have that they all get financially rewarded? Do you also get money for each thing you say in your daily life?
@crypto-econom1st, yes you actually get rewarded for every reasonable post and comments. You've not seen anything yet.... Thumbs up to steemit, for been outstanding
So I hope everything you say in life has value, otherwise it is best left unsaid. But the comments and back and forth are an important part of the value on a post. If 10 people comment, if gives an idea of their thoughts. It may or may not be perfect, but this is one way of rewarding that feedback.
@cryptick, this jassi guy is nearly upvoting all his own comments, probably together with a friend or upvoting not. In the last 2 days he had 20 comments which all received 2-3 upvotes. Average length of his comment is 3 words.
I rest my case.
He means the growth of new users; we got 45k new members in the last week.
This comment has received a 3.13 % upvote from @speedvoter thanks to: @jassi.
Great to see that we are growing :) Can't wait to see what will steem be at the end of 2018
This comment has received a 1.04 % upvote from @speedvoter thanks to: @sticker.
Happy to see new accounts are growing constantly...which will help the whole Steemit ecosystem positively!
love your posts
I think we can also determine some negative aspects in these statistics. The average number of comments is decreasing to just above 2. Which means there is less interaction. Where I personally believe interaction is very good for a social media platform.
Also the number of active users seems to stay behind on the number of new ones. If this is the case, then steemit could have some work to do.
I think you have a good point with the interactions. It is very important that people actually stay on the site and comment and read other's stuff, or else it's just a big place where everyone posts their own stuff and log outs, which is not good for the long-term.
Lots of people actually upvote good comments, so there is actually a pretty nice amount of money to be made from interacting, so I don't get why more people don't do it. One issue is probably that it is difficult to find good content on Steemit unless you know where to look.
What is precisely your definition of earning a nice amount with interaction?
I think it is pretty difficult to earn more than 1SBD per week. although I should probably be a bit less critical of I want to earn more. But my goal is not to earn only money.
I think most new steemonians get discouraged by the fact it is really difficult to get noticed. Mostly you have merely any followers, no views for your posts and you don't earn any money.
Even if you earn a few cents, the steemit system seems unfair. Because the whales easily get richer and richer and minnows are almost impossible to close this gap.
My definition of a nice amount from comments is probably $5+ each day, unless you write a whole lot of comments. I mean, no one will get rich from comments, but it should be entirely possible to make a few SBD every day from it.
This is very good report for a Steemit user.But i want to know .Enormous account creating is good or bad?If Steemit user will grow rapidly then how will SBD / steem price ?Is it increase or decrease ?
The general consensus is that more users = better for the community = increase in price.
While the amount of users increase, the amount of Steem produced does not, so it will likely just increase the demand, while the supply stays the same.
Can you compute the same report for the last month ?
thanks for info master @penguinpablo :)