SUGGESTIONS to IMPROVE Steemit - PULITZER PRIZE for Steemians
NO BOTS, NO BIDDING, NO STEEM POWER. Just plain, simple and transparent voting process like the Pulitzer, Nobel or Writers' Guild Awards.
I think its fair to say that the present upvote algorithm does not bode well for the majority if Steemians. It's good and it pays but the pay structure heavily favors the "powered up" and more importantly. it's not incentivizing the large majority of users who happen to be minnows. We need more than just upvotes and bot bids to make this community striving and growing for the long haul.
What Can We Do Better?
I call it the Steem Prize (someone could conjure a better name for this) - the Writers' Guild Award, Pulitzer or Nobel Prize for Steemians. The idea is to carefully search for that high quality, well-written posts which “produced the most outstanding work in an ideal direction.” This award should be is given to those who spent a considerable amount of time researching and writing the post that has inspired readers and influenced the Steemit ecosystem in a positive way. The PRIZE should be well worth the work: 500 Steem for one winning post each month.
Make it as creative and enticing as possible. Something that Steemians would look forward to every month. And no entry fees, please!
How Will Steemit & Steemians Benefit?
I'll use the analogy of a full-time employee who receives both fixed amount of wages each month and an incentive bonus. The salary is equivalent to the steem and steem dollars received through upvotes while the incentive bonus is the Steemit Prize.
Moving from being a minnow to a dolphin and eventually, a whale is hard. Just like every graduate who starts from the bottom of the corporate ladder and move up as he/she gain more experience and improve her/his performance, Steemians, first start as minnows. The corporate world isn't fair. It's filled with unfair practices to career advancement and promotions. Discrimination, office politics, personality conflicts, leadership style mismatch, cultural preferences etc. are but few of them. Regardless of where you are and what you do, you need to understand the rules of the game and navigate your way through them if you want to succeed. You need to understand how decisions made and who makes them, be savvy about political and group affiliations and maneuver yourself through these challenges to win that covet corner office. Equally important is to spot opportunities with the eye of an eagle and chase them like a lion hunting its prey.
The Steemit Prize will give each Steemian - minnow, dolphin or whale - equal opportunity to shine.
You got a 32.00% upvote from @postpromoter courtesy of @sandalphon!
I think this post is very useful for people who like to read, a lot of information that gives motivation especially for me personally who just knew steemit. even i like to imitate your writing style. @sandalphon I have followed your blog and I voted it
Why would you imitate someone's writing style? Doesn't that border on plagiarism if you're purposefully doing it?
Imitation can be used in the early stages of a learning process, whereas plagiarism involves copying/claiming someone else's ideas or work as your own. Inspiration vs false invention.
One may imitate a style they admire until they gain the experience to evolve it into their own. Fashion, computer programming, movies, methods of speaking and writing are areas where you can see this.
I'm glad that you like my writing style @donoho. I'm just discovering this deep writing fascination that I never knew existed within me. Enjoying it so far! Wish you luck!
@sandalphon
thank you friends, good people are people who benefit others. so what's wrong if we share among fellow human beings. once again I say thank you very much
@donoho I agree with your opinion, your best we may be one thought, because the more we see the example of one's experience then our insights and insights widened. thanks friends for the motivation
@efleda you know? I will not copy and paste, I am just amazed with the contents of his paper, keep in mind that I like neatness in writing either typing or handwriting, I am not plagiarism. thanks for the advice
awesome idea :)
All right, I agree with you @javybar
I love this idea. This will encourage more people to post quality posts.
no steem power? Then Steem as a currency will fall.. no one would want to keep their Steem and hold it as Steem Power.. then there won't be any demand for Steem.. Steem who has a current value of $1.60 won't have anyone to buy it even for $0.016
And full time authority and hire people to do governance? the reason why cryptocurrency works won't have its core function anymore..
Who the hell will be in-charge then? It's true Steemit Inc has majority of Steem on their hold but again it's not one central party who gets to decide how much shall be rewarded to whom...
The present method also brings outside investment.. many have bought Steem using their own money..
Let's see.. you can't mine any cryptocurrency for free.. can you? For those coins with Proof of Work one needs to invest on hardware and also pay big electricity bills..
So what you have proposed will not only result in the fall of Steem Price.. but also will make things go in a different direction.. One user gives their Steem to exchanges for another currency and that same Steem is sold to someone else who wants to Power Up.. if the Steem Power option is eliminated.. then only a fool would buy Steem from exchanges.. if that happens forget 500 Steem for well researched posts.. even 5000 Steem won't have value of $1
PS: excuse my English but I hope you get the gist of what I'm trying to explain here
would make sense but seems like its not going to happen
Of course it will not happen,
And much probably change the curation rewards from 75/25% to 50/50%
Coz this incentives came from the investors also which has more influence than the non investors!
If there were no investors, who will give incentives?
I feel the same way too. Great vision but only a wishful thinking. Where do the money come from? From whales? Smfh, forget about it.
I don't even kow how to contact the support to tell them about this change that we want, do you know how to contact them ? is there an email or chat or something ?
Hah you wish ;)
amazing
We need private messaging!! Like every other social media platform out there... steemit needs to make their platform socially attractive... right now we are all just here to make money rather than to connect..
I agree, the next step for us as a community is to forget about the money and turn this into a reddit of sorts. The money is jus why it is better than reddit ;)
Exactly right! Need to draw in those talkative creative types aha
yes!
yes they really need it!
No, I'm not, which is why I want messaging!
On the same site, like Facebook and Fb messenger!
Thanks for taking your time to write your suggestion but honestly, I am not in favor of the idea.
I don't want to see people competing for just 500 Steem. To be honest, trending authors can make 200+ Steem (or 100% SP), they can get to as high as 500+ Steem if their post is good enough. And curators are doing their job so nicely nowadays.
And if you now suggest the weekly competition, then I would like to bring it into your knowledge that @steemvoter used to pick a winner and award the author with votes worth of $200+ on daily/weekly basis (Before HF19, the awards used to be $500 to $1,000). So, the system is already tested.
Self-upvoted to make my comment more visible :)
This is not how a blockchain works! STEEM is a DPoS based blockchain where who have the highest stakes, have the highest power to contribute to the blockchain.
Even STEEM has some values of $1 or $2, because those whales or dolphins and minnows bought the coins from the market place. The whole thing of selection is another aspect of argument who are the committee (Noble selection committee) and how to select them, in case of STEEM blockchain, it is STEEM stakeholders. Also, selecting a top quality content is always limited by human biases which will always be hard to overcome. At least, in Steemit people are proposing alternatives and developers are working hard to implement them.
For starters, whatever the idea is, it has to be implementable within the codes, for example, 7 days voting period is here for a reason. Therefore, the proposal may sound very intelligent, but in code sense, it is very vogue!
Definitely makes sense. And those who have reinvested their STEEM back into STEEM deserves a bigger say...
why do they deserve a bigger say exactly ?
There are many Author sites out there for Authors to use, and outside of Authors, they don't get a lot of traffic.
Social media is more than writing ability. Not a fan of the idea, but then I am not a great writer nor do I desire or aspire to be one. When I first joinned SteemIt was on a "Quality" phase and every article to me read like some English 101 essay.
Not sure what the ideal direction would be, but I suspect if you asked 50 users you would get 50 answers.
I like crypto, bots, bids and such. I didn't mind churning my way slowly for 18 months. I just let the account slowly build. I added a bit of money here and there, but not a lot. I don't mind the path we are on. As long as traffic continues to grow, I feel we are on the right path.
I do acknowledge it would be nice if we had more distribution. Seeing the same old payouts to the same old people each day can get a little boring.