You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Removal of Delegations and the Death of Steemit...
Not to mention that going to a 50 50 split on rewards places equal weight on upvotes vs content creators. Such a system would fail. Content creators is what we need more of. Not people upvoting and profiting from the content creators
as you well explained in your post
i don't know what the hell is going through these people's minds
drive the creators off the platform and there's nothing left to curate
Exactly. I think I will write more on this and try to change some minds.
Not sure why you are downvoting me. @coninstant and @honusurf
an attack on me for using bidbots
Exactly. I think
I will write more on this and
Try to change some minds.
- truthforce
I'm a bot. I detect haiku.
Lol because curation is so awesome right now. I enjoy the simple logic you simple folk have: content creators give value to steem, not people who invest and power up to have a say over rewards for content creators, what would steem be without content creators, without content the world would implode, give 100% rewards to content creators, because why not, duh!
#no-compromise
#75percentofnothingyesplease
#orevenbetter-100percent-of-nothing
Posted using Partiko Android
take another read; I pointed out that all components provide value to the platform
O yeah sure did boss
Simple folk would much rather keep a broken system than compromise one inch.
Posted using Partiko Android