This post has been ranked within the top 50 most undervalued posts in the first half of Nov 24. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $6.63 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.
Wow. Where are all of the young people? The 18-24 demographic is almost non-existent. We need to work on that. This is supposed to be social media, isn't it?
Of course, I don't know about your sampling, but it still isn't a good sign.
Fascinating. It would be even more fascinating if all active users could be covered. For eg, there is NOBODY in my age group of 55-64 and I'm sure I'm not the only one in that age group. I'll follow you now anyway, in case you do another at some stage.
This post has been ranked within the top 50 most undervalued posts in the first half of Nov 24. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $6.63 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.
See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: Nov 24 - Part I. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.
If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.
Wow. Where are all of the young people? The 18-24 demographic is almost non-existent. We need to work on that. This is supposed to be social media, isn't it?
Of course, I don't know about your sampling, but it still isn't a good sign.
First, great survey @steempowertwins ! And yes I agree. We need a different demographic result in that area.
Not as non-existent as my age group of 55-64! I didn't expect a lot, but I expected it to be at least bigger than the 65-74 group!
Wicked analysis :-)
mostly young male geeks who live in the US or norther Eurp.?
Fascinating. It would be even more fascinating if all active users could be covered. For eg, there is NOBODY in my age group of 55-64 and I'm sure I'm not the only one in that age group. I'll follow you now anyway, in case you do another at some stage.