Art and the Reality of Real Estate in China and Changzhou

in #travel9 years ago (edited)

(Image Curtesy of Wikipedia)

The above painting is entitled "Lotus Flower Breaking the Surface," and it was created by Yun Shouping  惲壽平 , who also went by the name Yun Nantian  惲南田. This world renowned painter died in 1690, and he was born in 1633. His calligraphy and specialty in painting flowers has gone on to be come world famous. His work has been prominently exhibited outside China. I learned about this man because I happened upon his grave once, while wandering through a field in southern Changzhou. 

 


This burial site is well preserved, but it is hardly open to the public. After looking around, I decided to go looking to see if there was any memorial hall in Changzhou. According to the map, there is a former residence.  So, I got on my electric motor cycle and took a ride out to see it. Turns out, it's in a poor part of town. 

Turns out, what I found was a little underwhelming and disappointing

So, here is the former residence of a world famous Qing Dynasty artist. It sits largely abandoned, and like his grave, it's not open to the public. To be honest, this place is in a far flung part of the city's Wujin district. I found it because I was looking and searching for it with the aid of a cell phone map app. The saddest part of this was the notice pasted on the door. 


Here is a quick summary. Yun Shouping, aka Yun Nantian, had descendants. One of them was one of my college students, a few years ago. So, his descendants still live in Changzhou. So, why is this place abandoned? If this were America, those descendants would have turned this place into a tourist attraction to profit off the legacy of their renowned ancestor. Only, this is China, not the USA. And, despite all of its shopping malls and "market socialist" economic reform, China is still a communist country. This is not a criticism of China. It's just pointing out the reality, here. Chinese citizens do not own land. The government does. When Chinese people buy property, they are not actually buying property. They are buying long term leases. So, that means there are no hereditary claims to property in China. Yun Nantian's descendants have no claim on the property what so ever.

And, that is the saddest part of the above note. I can't read Chinese, and this what a friend told me, who can read Chinese and gave me a summary. Yun's present-day descendants tried to occupy this place and tried to renovate it. The above note is a legal notice against Yun's descendants, ordering them to stay away from the property. Even worse, fines were levied for renovation "damages" done to what is already a crumbling structure. In a very real way, this is a reminder of what an extremely convoluted thing the real estate business is in China. In the end, nobody own anything, and imminent domain seizures have very real teeth. 

(Besides the Wikipedia image, all other photographs are my own)

Sort:  

Kind of like our real estate here in Singapore.
Public housing are "sold" with 99 year lease. Actually, you get less than 99 year because the lease starts when the land get transferred to building.
Newer land for development of private residence also goes for 99 years leasehold. So, the lease starts when a developer acquired the land for development and by the time you move into your new private home, the lease are down by close to 5 years already.

I kind of suspected Hong Kong was similar and did a search. Found wiki and it seems there are similarities with leasehold lands.
https://steemit.com/photography/@ace108/flowers-for-a-good-week-ahead-20170417-original-by-ace108

@ace108
If you live to 100 then you loose your home. Just saying.

yes, we all know that but most people get a new place after some time plus you don't usually get your place until after 25 earliest. so far this has not been a problem.

I think the cultural revolution screwed it all up when it comes to remembering things like this. It's well over but the mentality with older generation is still there. I wonder if there is a demand with this generation to take a personal interests since educational interest doesn't seem to be happening.

Without a doubt if it could make money someone would be profiting from it, China loves capitalism. It is kind of nice the family didn't sell out their heritage for profit and that the sites are private, it shows someone must be doing something behind those closed doors, maintaining in the least.

I've noticed in China if anything has cash value they put a fence around it instantly and charge a fee to look at it. lol

Yeah, this is not in a profitable part of town. And it's really hard to get to even when you know what you are looking for. So, I somewhat agree.