RE: QUIQQER week in review - 2019 / 14
Hello, @pcsg-dev!
Thank you for another informative weekly report. It is good to see all the progress being made, and you managed to compose an interesting blog post that contains useful information about the recent developments.
On the content side, I think it's fair to say that you did a good job. The post is detailed, and includes valuable insights about the upcoming version. I particularly enjoyed reading about your personal knowledge and experience of working on this project; this is the kind of editorial content we like to see in blog posts. Keep up the good work.
That said, the post did have issues of style and proofreading, and I'd be happy to cite a few examples in a follow-up comment, if you wish. Nevertheless, this was a solid overall effort, and I appreciate the information you have provided us with.
I look forward to your next contribution.
Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.
To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.
Need help? Chat with us on Discord.
Yes please. We ask for improvement 😊👍
Hello!
First, my apologies for the slow reply.
I will cite a few examples for you:
This sentence should read: "We are back again with a weekly report of what happened in the QUIQQER space."
Not sure if I understood correctly, but let me rephrase that: "Today's report comes a bit earlier because there are a lot of meetings to be made tomorrow."
This would be a better sentence: "Not only do we find bugs so quickly by ourselves, but also many of the things only stand out in productive use."
I hope you will find this comment useful.
Thank you for your review, @lordneroo! Keep up the good work!