Truth bullies? Or logical people with reasonable questions?

There's been a few articles in the mainstream media lately about conspiracy theorists supposedly harassing some of the alleged victims of the Vegas mass shooting. One in particular, a man from BC, Canada, has been accused of faking a bullet to the head. I'm not denying that online harassment is happening and possibly real life harassment which is much more serious, but people generally don't harass people for no reason. Sometimes simple innocent questioning can be misconstrued as harassment, especially when the victim is highly publicized and active on social media.

So what would drive a person to question the validity of the injuries claimed? Well to be honest, my reasons would simply be the evidence put forward by the media and victims, that doesn't make any logical sense. This man was supposedly shot in the head and explained his injury as 'the bullet went in, traveled 3 inches along my skull, and came out here" The statement was accompanied by a photo of two small healed wounds and some wet hair. They didn't even shave his head, as his video interview was recorded on or before Wednesday Oct. 4th and he was preparing to be driven home a mere 3 days after the incident. His injuries do not coincide with the expected trauma caused by a high caliber bullet, even at long range. I'm not an expert in bullet injuries or medical procedures and I'm not saying he faked his injury, by any means, but common sense tells me something isn't right here. This is just one example. If you haven't watched any of the many "victims" tell their incredible stories and explain their injuries then immediately proceeding to do an action that would be impossible or highly painful with the injuries as described, I suggest you do. They are at the very least, highly entertaining.

A picture of the alleged bullet wounds.

The "problem" is, I'm definitely not the only one who sees it this way. Thousands, if not millions, are waking up to the fact that all of these highly publicized "tragedies" leave so many unanswered questions and questionable motives. The term "crisis actor" has become popularized quite recently and for good reason. There are so many problems with nearly all the witness testimony, mainstream narrative and actual evidence provided, that people have every right to be questioning the official story, in my opinion. The more people question and start really putting these "victims" under scrutiny, the more the media tries to paint a picture of crazed, insensitive, witch hunting conspiracy theorists running around angering the victims and victims families. While there may be a few people that fit this description, the majority of "truthers" are simply asking questions, when logic has failed to explain the evidence presented by the media. The mainstream news should be investigating these people who claim to be witnesses or victims when their stories and injuries are being questioned by a growing number of people. Instead the media simply defends everyone involved which quite clearly proves that if there is a conspiracy surrounding Vegas (there is) then the mainstream media is complicit in it.

People who are interested in learning what's really going on in the world around them, have to dig deeper than just the mainstream media outlets. We have to communicate with each other and determine the facts based on logical analysis and with as little contact with so called victims. I can see this heading in a bad direction. Vegas seems a little like truther bait, in a sense, similar to pizzagate. Even though its painfully obvious something is going on that the media is hiding, we can't actually come together and do anything about it. Instead the media controls the narrative making it seem wrong to talk about or have a different opinion, until the subject matter isn't fresh and interesting enough for the masses to care about and it slowly fades away.

CBC news clip

I look at it this way. If this was the only anomaly it would be easy to let it go as a one off. But when there are many other problems with nearly all of the stories, it should warrant some kind of investigation. If the victims are real, there would be far less problems with their stories and very few people would question or harass them. If the victims are paid actors, then truthers are doing a service exposing the fraud, as long as they don't violate the victims personal rights in the process of exposing them. This is where the fine line exists between genuine investigation and harassment or bullying. If we know people aren't telling the truth, are most likely faking injuries, making millions of dollars in donations, and we wanted to expose them for fraud, who would we go to? We can't go to the police, we can't call up the local news and get them to investigate, and we are being actively taken down off YouTube and social media sites for even trying to communicate ideas, thoughts and opinions. This is not bullying if the subject of the video is a suspected fraud and you are simply trying to show evidence of this. People who care about the truth and don't want to live in a world where their government and media outlets are complicit in lies and deception, need an outlet where they can't be bullied. Because discussing and analyzing evidence that has been presented to us should no way be deemed bullying. Let's talk about these things while we still have a chance because with each passing event we loose a little more of our dwindling freedoms.