You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Truth bullies? Or logical people with reasonable questions?
Logical analysis would imply that you actually speak to the victim and the medical staff who treated him. I don't think you can analyse anyone's injuries from behind a keyboard hundreds and thousands of kilometres away. You're the conspiracy theorist and the fact that there are hundreds and thousands just like you who won't accept the truth is frankly terrifying. You're clearly gullible and will believe non-facts but not the truth. That is scary.
Logical analysis?
No, just standard investigatory practices. Get the truth from as close to the source as possible.
The trouble with this is, if this a black flag event, then you cannot talk to those close to the source. They are unavailable. As in the FBI won't let you near them. And often "they" don't even exist.
So, we are left analysing photos. And asking people who have experience with triage to examine these photos.
From the photo above, a bullet did not cause that wound. When a bullet breaks through a bone, it leaves bone shards everywhere. These bone shards cut the flesh up every time they move. So, we must get out as many as we can. Thus, if the bullet went into the brain, we are going to have open brain surgery.
Further, the exit wound from a bullet is much larger than the entrance wound. The entire skin area around the exit wound will be a bloody, bruised mess.
Since, none of these always their things are not in the photo, then the photo is in doubt.
It is entirely possible for a bullet to impact the head at such an angle as to not damage the skull, but simply go under the skin, travel along the bone, and then exit the skin. It would cause one hell of a headache, but no lasting damage of the brain. This happens in war with full metal jacketed bullets, especially the small caliber bullets used in the AR-15 or M-16 type guns. Even 30 caliber bullets will do this if the bullet hits at a glancing angle instead of a straight on hit. A straight on hit would blow a chunk of skull and brains out of the exit wound due to hydraulic pressure.
The truth is not dictated by the mainstream media nor is it determined by consensus. I'm not claiming to have analyzed any injuries accurately nor could I if given the opportunity. However multiple military surgeons who can compare these injuries to what they have witnessed, have come forward and stated their opinions.
If I claimed I was injured with a similar injury and similar evidence and started a gofundme for my recovery, what would happen? If I didn't have the mainstream media to defend me, the evidence of my injury would probably not hold up if I was ever questioned for fraud. Now if people want to investigate my claim and suggest I'm a fraud while presenting their reasons why, are these people going to get labelled as insensitive bullies? Maybe if my injuries were legitimate my friends and family would be outraged and attack them, but the general population would likely label them heroes for exposing me. So where do we draw the line in investigating victims? A fraud is a fraud no matter what and I'm not saying any of these victims are frauds but if we are all being deceived, asking the victim or the medical staff supposedly involved isn't going to reveal the deception.