My Personal Reflection on the Delisting of SBD by Upbit

_{Edited by Canva}

Hello steemians,

As a user engaged in the Steem blockchain ecosystem, I pay close attention to any developments that may affect the tools we use on a daily basis, especially when it comes to an asset as important as Steem-Backed Dollars (SBD).

The recent announcement by Upbit, which designated the SBD as a "Cautionary Item" and temporarily suspended deposits, raises many questions and leads me to reflect on the possible motivations behind this decision, the implications it could have for users like me and actions that the Steemit community could consider in order to strengthen the stability and utility of SBD in an ever-changing cryptocurrency market.

---

Understand the reasons behind Upbit’s announcement

Source

In its official press release, Upbit justifies the SBD designation as a “cautionary item” by highlighting potential vulnerabilities and risks for users, identified through an assessment of its objectives, and current level of security adoption, prompting the platform to temporarily suspend deposits and launch an in-depth review to determine whether to maintain or permanently withdraw trading support, all as part of a review period ranging from December 30, 2024 to January 13, 2025 as part of a general policy aimed at protecting investors and ensuring a safe trading environment.

This approach, although it may seem purely preventative, actually reveals a critical assessment of the current role of SBD in the cryptocurrency market, which prompts me, as an active user, to examine the different factors that may have motivated such a decision while thinking about the possible consequences for the Steem ecosystem.

Explore potential reasons for this decision

Based on the information provided by Upbit, I believe that several factors, often linked together, may have led to the designation of the SBD as an asset requiring special attention, including its historical availability, because although it is presented as a stablecoin intended to maintain parity with the US dollar, SBD has regularly shown significant fluctuations, sometimes well above parity, which in my opinion compromises its credibility with traders and platforms that favor assets offering more stability and predictability.

Additionally, SBD's low trading volume on pairs like SBD/KRW and SBD/BTC may also have played a role, as limited activity makes this asset less attractive to a platform like Upbit which typically favors assets benefiting from significant adoption and liquidity while reducing operational complexity.

Finally, the strict requirements imposed by South Korean regulations, particularly in terms of compliance and transparency likely contributed to Upbit's caution, as it is possible that the SBD does not fully meet the required criteria, which could Explain why the platform considers this asset to present potential risks to users and prefer to take a more restrictive approach.

Consider the implications for the Steem ecosystem

I believe that the designation of the SBD as a "vigilance element" and the temporary suspension of its deposits risks having significant consequences for users and for the ecosystem as a whole, because by limiting the accessibility and negotiability of the SBD, this decision reduces the possibilities for users to exchange or convert this asset, which could slow its adoption and diminish its appeal not only within the Steemit community but also in the broader cryptocurrency market.

Furthermore, this classification also risks harming the reputation of the SBD, as being labeled as an asset requiring special monitoring may deter new investors or users from interacting with it, which could weaken its role as a central pillar of the Steem ecosystem, although I see this situation as also representing an opportunity for the community to re-examine the role of the SBD and implement concrete actions to improve its long-term stability and usefulness.

---

Propose solutions to strengthen the SBD

I am convinced that it is crucial for the Steemit community to take targeted measures to stabilize the value of SBD and strengthen its market position, for example by introducing mechanisms to reduce volatility and encourage its use in payments or transactions, which could help restore investor and user confidence while strengthening its appeal as a reliable and relevant digital asset.

Additionally, I think it would be wise to explore partnerships with other exchanges in order to compensate for the visibility losses caused by Upbit's decision and expand the options available for trading SBD, while engaging in constructive dialogue with Upbit to understand their specific concerns and propose solutions that could meet their expectations, which could help achieve a more favorable outcome for this critical asset.

Conclusion

While Upbit's designation of the SBD as a "Cautionary Item" represents a significant challenge, I do not view this as an insurmountable threat to the Steem ecosystem but rather as an opportunity for the community to demonstrate its ability to adapt and resolve the issues raised while working collectively to strengthen the relevance and utility of this asset in an ever changing market.

My commitment to Steemit and the Steem blockchain remains intact, as I remain confident that the community, through its resilience and ingenuity will overcome these obstacles and guarantee a dynamic and sustainable future for the SBD as well as for the entire community.

Best Regards,
@kouba01