I understand your concern, and transparency in curation is definitely important for trust on the platform.

At the same time, curation teams often work within guidelines that may not always be visible to users, so what looks like “repeat selection” can sometimes be part of internal evaluation systems or overlapping quality standards rather than direct bias.

That said, your point highlights something valuable — the need for continued improvement in fairness, diversity of selections, and clearer visibility of how curators make decisions.

Hopefully the Steemit team can review feedback like this and keep refining the system so that more unique and deserving posts across all communities get recognized consistently.

Constructive discussions like this are important for platform growth.