There is an analytic philosophy in the second half

There is an analytic philosophy in the second half of the 20th century or an informally linguistic paradigm in analytical philosophy. We talked about what led the analysts to abandon the hope of exposing the language scrupulously to Mona Lisa by the methods of logic and get the final authentic philosophical knowledge and full the completed methodological apparatus for science has proved that this is an impossible task and, moreover, the program of logical positivism is analytic s philosophy of wounds was not based on internal contradictory assumptions And what happened next before the question arose Where to look for other criteria of reliability and in this search, analysts from logic turned to ordinary language, that is, as far as I understand how much I represent about the situation about this. And at the beginning of the analysts calculated that if you clean the language then check it to believe his logic to get rid of those traps that are placed in it, you can make some absolutely accurate, authentic language neutral language with the help of which can be objectively described however, as the project has been realized, it turned out that the Mission is not feasible alternative, first, he criticized his former views secondly. He suggested a new view of languages ​​seems to exist as some not the main category of philosophy of the late Wittgenstein of Hellenistic philosophy, followed by a language game or the context Well, in fact, these are the key concepts just to justify what is happening But this is one of the because the phrase let's build a logic based on the language nor conversely should somehow be justified if the end justifies the following as I imagine that if there is a question about how to recover