You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: HF20 Exploratory Data Analysis on Proposed PayOut Changes
I see a lot of bid bots in the graphs and that is understandable. A lots of bots had no minimum post age to accept bids. So, people post according to bid bot's vote rounds and send last minute bids to deny curation rewards to bid bots. As the bot votes between 1-5 minutes, they can keep large portion of the curator SP for themselves. They create lots of garbage posts just to exploit bots for their own gains.
So, HF 20 changes may reduce this behavior and encourage curators to curate more. I am hopeful these changes will bring good to the community, if not there is always a chance of HF 21. :)
I dont think these changes are too bad myself. As i mentioned in the post, calculating the worth of a vote has a lot of factors. Just because the money goes back to the rewards pool, does not mean that it gets paid out proportionally to the higher earners. In fact it could aid in the growth of the rewards pool which I believe will become a factor in attracting new investors.