You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: A Little Something for the Delusional Sophists of Steemit: A Rebuttal to an Article Written by @kyriacos
Are you just throwing the word "strawman" in order to make a point? Do you even know what strawman is?
A state can be a voluntary place. People vote for it right? So what is your problem if they want to be abused?
There is no "consistency" in morals. morals are subjective. everyone is different.
you are talking bullshit regarding the rest. neo-anarchist mind in all its glory. propaganda over propaganda.
I haven't argued that one way or the other. Do you even read the posts or do you just have a bot that spits out random condescending sentences?
I don't know what "hold the state responsible for the ills of society" even means really, that isn't a sentence that just clearly means something without you explaining it more. So I couldn't possibly have an opinion.
I do think initiating violence against someone always makes things worse.
Ya I know what a strawman is. Presumably I was trying to make a point, ya. (my point though was just that you didn't have one, that you were barking at something nobody had claimed.)
I don't know what a neo-anarchist is, that one I would need explained.
if you can't digest that someone can be an anarchist and not hold the state responsible for the ills of society then i can't help you.
His whole argument is based on this premise. a neoanarchist thinks that an anarchist is a product of rebellion against the state.
do i seriously need to chew the obvious?