The Illusion of Choice - 10 Reasons Why Democracy FailssteemCreated with Sketch.

in #anarchy8 years ago (edited)

The Illusion of Choice - 10 Reasons Why Democracy Fails


source

This my translation of an article written by Frank Karsten.

Many people will tell you that democracy is the best system out there. They would name it in the same sentence as words like peace, freedom, and Prosperity. But why suffer many Western democracies from high debt, unemployment, and social tensions? Here are ten reasons why democracy doesn't bring what it's supposed to.

1. Short Term Action Is Embedded

Elected politicians only have power for a short term. Therefore, they know that they will enjoy the temporary advantages of spending money, raising taxes or printing even more money. But their successors will have to deal with the negative consequences, who are possibly their political enemies as well. Unfortunately, they also tend to avoid the problems they face during their terms, because they experience the same impulses.

Because of this, politicians behave like messy tenants instead of responsible owners. They don't seem to be able to protect our borders, security, autonomy, economy or finances for a long term, as opposed to their rhetoric of course. They shove problems under the carpet, trivialize them, buy them off by spending more money or tackle them with more laws and prohibitions.


source

2. Democracy Is Not Neutral

You would think that anything is possible in a democracy: left, right, liberal, socialist or conservative. But a democracy is in essence always collectivist. It's the idea that we could make any choice collectively and that the outcome of the process has to be obeyed by everyone, including the people that are against it.

Thus, in a democracy a person is subject to the desires of the collective. No wonder that all parties are collectivist and that even the VVD (Dutch liberal party) has a party program that the SDAP (the old Dutch Workers' Party) would be jealous about.


source

3. Democracy is Totalitarian

The problem with democracy is that there is no fundamental limit over what the majority can vote about. In other words, the state can decide. Whether it's about the design of offices (labor laws), floors in restaurants, wages, healthcare, education, free plastic bags in stores, soda in large bottles, or smoking in your car, democracies have laws about it.

Democracy allows the government to regulate, control, and steer our lives in every detail. Of course with the excuse that it's better for us. Who doesn't obey gets a ticket or gets thrown in jail. No money, property or individual freedom is safe in a democratic state, and the constitution is just a piece of paper that apparently can't protect us from it.


source

4. Democracy Is A Giant Restistribution Machine

In a democracy, everyone tries to live at the expense of others, and that is allowed. By voting, people try to put their own desires and goals on another person's bill. Politicians happily anticipate this desire. Explicitly or implicitly they say: "Vote for me and I'll take away some else's money and rights in favor of yours".

This redistribution isn't necessarily about 'from the rich to the poor'. It's always about the 'powerless, the productive, or the responsible people to the powerful, the layabout, or irresponsible people'.


source

5. Democracy Leads to Moral Decay

The democratic redistribution machine, and especially the welfare state, punishes successful people through higher taxes and give their wealth to people who are in trouble. But alas, what you tax, you get less, and what you subsidize, you get more.

That way, the redistribution machine stimulates hedonism, lazyness, anti-social behavior, irresponsibility, and it discourages good traits. It weakens family ties and the sense of community, and replaces values like self-sustainability with victimhood and dependency. In a free society, a person has to behave in a social, responsible, and honest manner, otherwise he'll lose the support of his family, friends, neighbors, and colleagues.

But people that pierce their whole face full with rings and can't find a job because of it, parents who raise their children badly, or rude neighbors who cause disturbances are helped by the welfare state through assistance, subsidies, and welfare. The organizations within the welfare state don't spend their own money, but other people's money, and thus they are looking for more 'customers', not less.

6. Democracy Is Not about Minority Rights

Often people think that a democracy protects the rights of minorities, but that is not true because democracy is by definition about majority rights. The basic principle of a democracy is that the majority decides. The majority does have the right to give more rights to minorities, but this is subject to fashion, not morality. Groups that yell, intimidate or that are aggressive are mostly able to obtain more rights, sometimes even at the expense of majority rights.

For example, people who smoke used to be protected, not anymore. Homosexual people used to have very few rights, now many. Rich people and entrepreneurs have always been a minority with few rights. Individual freedom, not democracy, is about minority rights, because the individual is the smallest minority.

7. Democracy Protects The Powers That Be Against the People

Democracy doesn't defend the people against the state, but the other way around. Our elected politicians can start wars under false premises, break election promises, print as much money as they want, but they never end up in jail because of it. Their excuse is that this was the result of the democratic process and that this is their interpretation of it.

If they spend €5,000 of tax money on themselves they're in danger, but they can easily waste 5 billion on a megalomaniac project. The worst that can happen to a failing government is that you won't vote for them anymore, but the choice for the citizen is very limited and voting on someone else is only useful when you can get the majority to do so as well. Democracy is a bad way to control power, so no wonder that democratic states constantly grow in wealth and power.

8. Democracy Makes Moral What Is Immoral

If someone robs you on the street, everyone thinks that's immoral. But magically a similar act is called 'social justice' when 50% + 1 of the voters want to see it happen. However, 'majority' is not the same as 'justice' or 'morality'.

Morals are determined by principles of good and evil, not numbers. If 99% of the people think that homosexuality is wrong, it should still be allowed. If 99% of the people thinks someone should be robbed, it's still theft.

9. Voting Is Useless

Lenin could have said: "Voters are the useful idiots of a democracy". Voting is wasted effort and gives the wrong impression that the people in power are legitimate. In a big election there is a higher chance you have a traffic accident on your way to the voting booth than that your vote sways the result of the election.

And if your vote actually determines the outcome of the amount of seats in parliament, it probably won't influence policy. Moreover, politicians can break their promises without punishment. Voting is more or less as effective as cheering on your favorite football team.

10. Democracy Leads to Oligarchy

Being able to choose one party like in North Korea is a dictatorship. But being able to choose between two parties, like in the US, is somehow seen as freedom. One single vote doesn't influence much, but a vote for a small party makes that vote worth even less.

That's why people often vote strategically. They don't choose the party of their preference, but the least bad biggest party, a party that actually has a chance to come to power.

This mostly leads to two or three parties forming a sort of oligarchy. For political newcomers it's often difficult to break that, regardless of the possible electoral threshold.

Thanks for reading! Be sure to follow me @rvanstel, upvote and resteem.

Sort:  

Its representative parlamentarism, they stole the word democracy from the left because it sounds nice.

I agree with every point made tho, resteemed.

It is sad to see your post is not taking off, even after I resteemed it. I did some translations (for subtitles) myself and I know that it is pretty monotonous work. Of course I also think the points made in the article are very valid and worth thinking/discussing about. I somehow expect @twitterbot to be responsible for the small amount of upvotes, he could be a plagiarism bot.

Thank you for your hard work!

Thanks a lot! Danke schön :)

And yeah, I think I need to gather some more followers first...

@thatgermandude pointed this post out to me. I had missed it but it had some similar concepts I had written about, though your article is more detailed. Mine was generally asking what makes a group of people being able to FORCE you to do certain things any better than an individual being able to FORCE you to do certain things.

Anyway good post. I am resteeming it to put it there with mine and another interesting Socrates one I resteemed.

why is this kind of shit so hard for people to see? Why would people willfully ignore reality and blatant violations against them as people? I'm glad that it appears like more folks are being "red pilled", but I worry that its too little too late.

whoismrrobot Mr. Robot tweeted @ 02 Jul 2015 - 02:54 UTC

Our society, the illusion of choice. #MrRobot http://t.co/ktfdVOyFCe

Disclaimer: I am just a bot trying to be helpful.

Who made you and what is your purpose?

DalekPrimeFinished.png

Sad fact: Almost every democracy I know of exists with a 2-party system; folks either get to choose a devil or a demon. And suddenly an anarchist does not seem like a bad choice.

The Netherlands has many political parties in parliament, but a few big parties form a government with a slight majority of the seats.

You need to know more democracies because the 2 party system is the minority system.

It does not really change if you have 2 or 10 parties, they are topics where almost every party agrees while many people are against it like the EU.

Free will itself is an ilusion, let alone the choices of democracy

high debt, unemployment, and social tensions

Why do you see those 3 things as bad? Answer please for every single one.

democracy is the best system out there
democracy protects the rights of minorities, but that is not true

You seem to make a little error here.
Your words imply that you think that a democracy has per definition be perfect.
But that is not the case.
It is a relative connection. Democracy is the worst of all governments, except all the others (or none).
That is because a Democracy does protect minorities - not all and if all then not with the same level - more then any other governmental form.

High debt is bad because it's the government that spends and the taxpayer pays. And since not everyone agrees with the government's policy, I don't think that's fair.

Unemployment isn't necessarily bad, but is perceived as such by many.

Social tensions are often caused by the government taking away the right to free association. If you force people to interact with other people you don't want to interact with, it can get tense.

But again, this is an article I translated. It doesn't necessarily and entirely reflect my views, but I wanted to share it with Steemit because I thought the original author has an interesting viewpoint. And I also wanted to show off my translation skills ;-)

Do you think that saving money (as in increasing the numbers on your bank account) is a good thing?

Depends. What are you suggesting?

The simple fact that there is no asset without debt. You cannot like the one and hate the other. Both are - quite literally - the 2 sides of the same coin.

If you have 100$ in a bank account, the bank has 100$ debt towards you.
If the state has 100$ debt then someone else has saved 100$ - very likely in a pension fund or insurance.
If you remove that debt...

All very true, but that shouldn't be an excuse for a government to impose the use of a currency onto people that don't want to use it. Neither should it be an excuse for a government to spend other people's money if they don't consent to it.

I agree with you on the financial aspect but that's not the point of the article, I think.

There is no (non-dictatorial) government that imposes on you (private person) the use of a certain currency.
Quite contrary the government gives a guarantee that you can use a certain currency to buy things - it protects you.

You are free to use nearly any other thing (except drugs, atomic missiles etc.) as a currency with whomever you can find that accepts that.

And if you don't want the government to spend money you are free to leave it and go somewhere where there are no roads, no healthcare, no fire fighters etc.

I have to disagree with you. You already say it yourself: the government gives a guarantee that you can use a certain currency to buy things....... by forcing other people to accept that form of currency. Besides, governments force people to pay taxes in one currency only, so I don't think it's fair to say that people are always free to choose what currency to use. If it moves, it's taxed. That doesn't leave you with a lot of freedom in my opinion.

And yeah, if you don't like it, you can move to Somalia lol